[U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-marvell v2 06/12] board: turris_mox: Cosmetic restructurization

[Stefan Roese]

On 20.11.18 12:40, Marek Behun wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:27:48 +0100
> Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 20.11.18 12:24, Marek Behun wrote:
>>>> Any updates on this? Please rebase the still missing patches from
>>>> this series on top of latest mainline.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>> I am (almost regularly) rebasing new patches on top of mainline in
>>> this repository https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/turris/mox-u-boot
>>> I did not sent the patches yet because I don't know if my model of
>>> kernel devicetree patching will be accepter in kernel.
>>> That is: I want to push a complete device-tree for Mox with nodes
>>> for all modules to kernel, but with nodes for different modules
>>> disabled. The code in u-boot shall then enable the nodes for devices
>>> which are enumerated in u-boot. I don't yet know if such a
>>> device-tree will be accepted in kernel though.
>>
>> That's a perfect understandable reasoning and makes sense. So its
>> perhaps best if we remove the pending patches from the patchwork
>> queue for now. And you will submit fresh patches, once such a
>> decision has been made.
>>
>> Okay?
>>
> 
> Hi,
> I can send patches which won't be affected by this, though, like the
> one that fixes A3720 watchdog implementation to be kernel compliant. I
> am going to rebase and send them, ok?

Sure, go ahead.

Thanks,
Stefan