[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] dm: video: bridge: don't fail to activate bridge if reset or sleep GPIO is missing
André Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Thu Oct 18 00:22:20 UTC 2018
On 10/17/18 6:09 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> Both GPIOs are optional, so we shouldn't fail if any is missing. Without
> this fix reset is not deasserted when sleep GPIO is missing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul at gmail.com>
That looks much better now, thanks.
One small thing:
> ---
> drivers/video/bridge/video-bridge-uclass.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/bridge/video-bridge-uclass.c b/drivers/video/bridge/video-bridge-uclass.c
> index cd4959cc71..7542097769 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/bridge/video-bridge-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/bridge/video-bridge-uclass.c
> @@ -109,10 +109,16 @@ int video_bridge_set_active(struct udevice *dev, bool active)
> int ret;
This needs to be initialised now.
Cheers,
Andre.
>
> debug("%s: %d\n", __func__, active);
> - ret = dm_gpio_set_value(&uc_priv->sleep, !active);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - if (active) {
> + if (uc_priv->sleep.dev) {
> + ret = dm_gpio_set_value(&uc_priv->sleep, !active);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (!active)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (uc_priv->reset.dev) {
> ret = dm_gpio_set_value(&uc_priv->reset, true);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list