[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] efi_loader: bootmgr: run an EFI application of a given load option
Alexander Graf
agraf at suse.de
Thu Oct 18 08:46:36 UTC 2018
On 18.10.18 07:48, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17.10.18 09:32, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> With this patch applied, we will be able to selectively execute
>>> an EFI application by specifying a load option, say "-1" for Boot0001,
>>> "-2" for Boot0002 and so on.
>>>
>>> => bootefi bootmgr -1 <fdt addr>
>>
>> I don't think -1 is very good user experience :). How about
>> => bootefi bootmgr Boot0001 <fdt addr>
>
> It looks like u-boot's run command with six more characters!
> How about this:
>
> => bootefi bootmgr #1 <fdt addr>
So what is the problem with making it Boot0001? That way at least the
variable name is consistent across the board ;).
> or allowing "-" as empty fdt,
>
> => bootefi bootmgr - 1
>
> Otherwise, a new sub command?
>
> => bootefi run 1, or
> => efi(shell) run 1
>
> # Discussing UI is a fun or mess.
Yeah :(. What we really need would be that "bootefi bootmgr" becomes
"efiboot". But that would be even more confusing ;).
So the whole rationale of why "bootefi" is the way it is today is that
it's trying to lean on the existing "bootm", "booti", "bootz" etc syntax
as much as it can. In other words, it's trying to fit into the U-Boot
ecosystem much rather than the existing edk2 one.
I would like to keep following that path going forward. Whenever there
is an option between "U-Boot like" and "edk2 like" I would always opt
for the "U-Boot like" user experience, because if they want edk2 they
may as well use edk2 ;).
Alex
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list