[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] net: e1000: support 'write_hwaddr' in DM
Joe Hershberger
joe.hershberger at ni.com
Mon Oct 29 17:55:14 UTC 2018
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:34 PM Hannes Schmelzer <hannes at schmelzer.or.at> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/25/2018 08:41 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:26 AM Hannes Schmelzer
> > <hannes.schmelzer at br-automation.com> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> >
> >> + * reading the current address failed
> >> + */
> >> + if (!ret_val && memcmp(current_mac, mac, 6) == 0)
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
> >> + data[i] = mac[i * 2 + 1] << 8 | mac[i * 2];
> >> +
> >> + ret_val = e1000_write_eeprom_srwr(hw, 0x0, 3, data);
> > This is a pretty uncommon implementation of this driver operation.
> > Does the i120 in this case read the MAC directly from the EEPROM?
> >
> > Usually this function is used to write the hwaddr into the registers
> > of the MAC. The .read_rom_hwaddr is used to fetch the hwaddr from the
> > EEPROM and that address is used in the case that the U-Boot env has
> > not set one.
> This implementation is not new, just moved a bit upward in the file to
> avoid forward declaration for non-DM build.
Yes, I understand... I just brought it up since I was looking at it
and maybe you had some insight.
> I will double check it, but i guess there will be no change until we've
> no fail behavior of the existing code.
What do you mean here?
>
> I didn't imagine that this little change would become so big ;-)
:) Sorry, wasn't meaning for it to be big... my comment about the
current implementation is not meant to block this change.
> I will provide some v3 within next days with the cosmetic cleanup and
> other requested changes.
Thanks!
>
> cheers,
> Hannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list