[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: socfpga: Fix bootcounter located at the end of internal SRAM
Simon Goldschmidt
simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com
Tue Oct 30 13:02:52 UTC 2018
Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> schrieb am Di., 30. Okt. 2018, 13:50:
> On 30.10.18 13:37, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:28 PM Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30.10.18 12:17, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >>> > diff --git a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> >>> > index 2330143cf1..bd8f5c8c41 100644
> >>> > --- a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> >>> > +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> >>> > @@ -31,8 +31,21 @@
> >>> > #define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR 0xFFE00000
> >>> > #define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE 0x40000 /*
> 256KB */
> >>> > #endif
> >>> > +
> >>> > +/*
> >>> > + * Some boards (e.g. socfpga_sr1500) use 8 bytes at
> the end of the internal
> >>> > + * SRAM as bootcounter storage. Make sure to not put
> the stack directly
> >>> > + * at this address to not overwrite the bootcounter
> by checking, if the
> >>> > + * bootcounter address is located in the internal
> SRAM.
> >>> > + */
> >>> > +#if ((CONFIG_SYS_BOOTCOUNT_ADDR >
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR) && \
> >>> > + (CONFIG_SYS_BOOTCOUNT_ADDR <
> (CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + \
> >>> > +
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE)))
> >>> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR
> CONFIG_SYS_BOOTCOUNT_ADDR
> >>> > +#else
> >>> > #define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR
> \
> >>> > (CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR +
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE)
> >>> > +#endif
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can we have this check on CONFIG_INIT_RAM_SIZE instead of the
> >>> initial stack pointer?
> >>>
> >>> That would ensure the SPL size checks stay intact.
> >>
> >> I'm not really sure what you mean with this. Could you please
> >> explain in more detail?
> >
> > Sorry for being unclear. What I meant was: currently
> > CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZEis 0x10000 (the full 64 kByte).
> > So if CONFIG_SYS_BOOTCOUNT_ADDR is 0xfffffff8, I think we should
> > define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE to 0xfff8. That way, not only the
> > CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR define is correct but CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE is
> > checked to not overlap this address, too.
> >
> > Would that make sense to you?
>
> Yes, I thought that you meant it this way. I'm not sure if we
> should go this way. As we would change CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE
> to something that does not represent the physical size of the
> on-chip SRAM. This could be very confusing and misleading, if
> this define is used elsewhere.
>
Hmm, okay. I dont want to push you there. I just thought it would be good
to have the SPL binary size check correct...
Simon
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list