[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCHv4 2/9] armv8: lx2160a: add MMU table entries for PCIe

Bin Meng bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Mon Apr 1 09:35:45 UTC 2019


Hi Zhiqiang,

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 5:26 PM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bin,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
> > Sent: 2019年4月1日 17:15
> > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net; Priyanka Jain
> > <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>; York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>;
> > yamada.masahiro at socionext.com; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> > <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>; M.h.
> > Lian <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 2/9] armv8: lx2160a: add MMU table entries
> > for PCIe
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 5:11 PM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bin,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for your comments!
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: 2019年4月1日 13:32
> > > > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> > > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net; Priyanka Jain
> > > > <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>; York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>;
> > > > yamada.masahiro at socionext.com; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> > > > <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>;
> > M.h.
> > > > Lian <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 2/9] armv8: lx2160a: add MMU table
> > > > entries for PCIe
> > > >
> > > > Hi Zhiqiang,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:08 PM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Bin,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks a lot for your comments!
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
> > > > > > Sent: 2019年4月1日 11:22
> > > > > > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> > > > > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net; Priyanka
> > > > > > Jain <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>; York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>;
> > > > > > sriram.dash at nxp.com; yamada.masahiro at socionext.com; Prabhakar
> > > > > > Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu
> > > > > > <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>; M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 2/9] armv8: lx2160a: add MMU table
> > > > > > entries for PCIe
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:24 AM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou at nxp.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The lx2160a have up to 6 PCIe controllers and have different
> > > > > > > address and size of PCIe region.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou at nxp.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > V4:
> > > > > > >  - No change
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c            | 12
> > > > > > ++++++++++++
> > > > > > >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h     |  2 ++
> > > > > > >  .../include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch3.h  | 14
> > > > > > > +++++++++++++-
> > > > > > >  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > > > > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > > > > index 978d46b32f..2805e5f6f2 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > > > > @@ -257,6 +257,18 @@ static struct mm_region final_map[] = {
> > > > > > >           PTE_BLOCK_MEMTYPE(MT_DEVICE_NGNRNE) |
> > > > > > >           PTE_BLOCK_NON_SHARE | PTE_BLOCK_PXN |
> > > > > > PTE_BLOCK_UXN
> > > > > > >         },
> > > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LX2160A
> > > > > > > +       { SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_ADDR, SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_ADDR,
> > > > > > > +         SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_SIZE,
> > > > > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_MEMTYPE(MT_DEVICE_NGNRNE) |
> > > > > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_NON_SHARE | PTE_BLOCK_PXN |
> > > > > > PTE_BLOCK_UXN
> > > > > > > +       },
> > > > > > > +       { SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_ADDR, SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_ADDR,
> > > > > > > +         SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_SIZE,
> > > > > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_MEMTYPE(MT_DEVICE_NGNRNE) |
> > > > > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_NON_SHARE | PTE_BLOCK_PXN |
> > > > > > PTE_BLOCK_UXN
> > > > > > > +       },
> > > > > > >  #endif
> > > > > > >         { CONFIG_SYS_FSL_WRIOP1_BASE,
> > > > > > CONFIG_SYS_FSL_WRIOP1_BASE,
> > > > > > >           CONFIG_SYS_FSL_WRIOP1_SIZE, diff --git
> > > > > > > a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > > > > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > > > > index 89124cdb0e..bdeb62576c 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > > > > @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
> > > > > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_PHYS_SIZE     0x800000000
> > > > > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_PHYS_SIZE     0x800000000
> > > > > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE4_PHYS_SIZE     0x800000000
> > > > > > > +#define SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_SIZE            0x800000000
> > > > > > > +#define SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_SIZE            0x800000000
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why are these macros not CONFIG_ prefixed?
> > > > >
> > > > > The new added macros with prefix CONFIG_ will result in build
> > > > > error, so we
> > > > don't add the CONFIG_ prefix.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am curious how can such prefix cause build error?
> > >
> > > It looks like the CFGCHK scripts reports the error as following:
> > >  CFGCHK  u-boot.cfg
> > > Error: You must add new CONFIG options using Kconfig The following new
> > > ad-hoc CONFIG options were detected:
> > > CONFIG_SYS_PCIE5_ADDR
> > >
> >
> > If so, I think we need convert other CONFIG_SYS_PCIE* macros to either
> > Kconfig, or remove the CONFIG_ prefix too.
> >
> > Since it is configurable by the user, not hardcoded by the SoC, it is preferable
> > to be converted to Kconfig. Thanks!
>
> Actually, they are hardcoded by SoC, that's the reason I appended they in the .h
> file instead Kconfig.
>

OK, thanks for the clarification.

> So, I think remove the prefix make more sense, while it is another story, will submit
> a separate patch to do that, not only for the PCIe related macros.
>

Sound a good plan to me.

Regards,
Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list