[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "cmd: Kconfig: Do not include EEPROM if DM_I2C is used without DM_I2C_COMPAT"

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Hello Heiko,

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 7:20 AM Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de> wrote:
>
> Hello Marek, Simon,
>
> Am 09.04.2019 um 21:30 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > On 4/9/19 8:53 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >> Am 30.03.2019 um 22:18 schrieb Simon Glass:
> >>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 06:39, Simon Goldschmidt
> >>> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> This reverts commit 65a97e7fcf54feb7c4ebe1aee8a572830af4cf51.
> >>>>
> >>>> The 'eeprom' command has been converted to work with DM_I2C in a patch
> >>>> submitted around the same time as this commit:
> >>>> commit 0c07a9b4078d ("eeprom: Add device model based I2C support to
> >>>> eeprom command")
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>> - added patch to fix DM_I2C eeprom code to work without
> >>>>     CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_BUS
> >>>>
> >>>>    cmd/Kconfig | 1 -
> >>>>    1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Who will take this series? It's assigned in to Marek in patchwork, but
> >> might go via Heiko's i2c tree? Or directly via Tom?
> >>
> >> I have sent patches (move socfpga_vining to DM_I2C) that are based on
> >> this series...
> >
> > Heiko should at least AB/RB it , then I can take it via socfpga tree to
> > avoid dependency problems.
>
> Just add to this patches my RB tag, so please pick it up, to prevent
> dependency problems, thanks!

OK, I'll do that.

Thanks,
Simon