[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "cmd: Kconfig: Do not include EEPROM if DM_I2C is used without DM_I2C_COMPAT"

[Marek Vasut]

On 4/10/19 7:20 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Marek, Simon,
> 
> Am 09.04.2019 um 21:30 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> On 4/9/19 8:53 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> Am 30.03.2019 um 22:18 schrieb Simon Glass:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 06:39, Simon Goldschmidt
>>>> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This reverts commit 65a97e7fcf54feb7c4ebe1aee8a572830af4cf51.
>>>>>
>>>>> The 'eeprom' command has been converted to work with DM_I2C in a patch
>>>>> submitted around the same time as this commit:
>>>>> commit 0c07a9b4078d ("eeprom: Add device model based I2C support to
>>>>> eeprom command")
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> - added patch to fix DM_I2C eeprom code to work without
>>>>>     CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_BUS
>>>>>
>>>>>    cmd/Kconfig | 1 -
>>>>>    1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Who will take this series? It's assigned in to Marek in patchwork, but
>>> might go via Heiko's i2c tree? Or directly via Tom?
>>>
>>> I have sent patches (move socfpga_vining to DM_I2C) that are based on
>>> this series...
>>
>> Heiko should at least AB/RB it , then I can take it via socfpga tree to
>> avoid dependency problems.
> 
> Just add to this patches my RB tag, so please pick it up, to prevent
> dependency problems, thanks!

Then put the RB tag here , so that PW can pick it :)

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut