[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "cmd: Kconfig: Do not include EEPROM if DM_I2C is used without DM_I2C_COMPAT"

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Marek,

Am 10.04.2019 um 10:05 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On 4/10/19 7:20 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Marek, Simon,
>>
>> Am 09.04.2019 um 21:30 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>>> On 4/9/19 8:53 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>>> Am 30.03.2019 um 22:18 schrieb Simon Glass:
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 06:39, Simon Goldschmidt
>>>>> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This reverts commit 65a97e7fcf54feb7c4ebe1aee8a572830af4cf51.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The 'eeprom' command has been converted to work with DM_I2C in a patch
>>>>>> submitted around the same time as this commit:
>>>>>> commit 0c07a9b4078d ("eeprom: Add device model based I2C support to
>>>>>> eeprom command")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>>> - added patch to fix DM_I2C eeprom code to work without
>>>>>>      CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_BUS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     cmd/Kconfig | 1 -
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Who will take this series? It's assigned in to Marek in patchwork, but
>>>> might go via Heiko's i2c tree? Or directly via Tom?
>>>>
>>>> I have sent patches (move socfpga_vining to DM_I2C) that are based on
>>>> this series...
>>>
>>> Heiko should at least AB/RB it , then I can take it via socfpga tree to
>>> avoid dependency problems.
>>
>> Just add to this patches my RB tag, so please pick it up, to prevent
>> dependency problems, thanks!
> 
> Then put the RB tag here , so that PW can pick it :)

already done, see:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1065524/#2149315

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52   Fax: +49-8142-66989-80   Email: hs at denx.de