[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "cmd: Kconfig: Do not include EEPROM if DM_I2C is used without DM_I2C_COMPAT"

[Marek Vasut]

On 4/10/19 10:19 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Marek,
> 
> Am 10.04.2019 um 10:05 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> On 4/10/19 7:20 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Marek, Simon,
>>>
>>> Am 09.04.2019 um 21:30 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>>>> On 4/9/19 8:53 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>>>> Am 30.03.2019 um 22:18 schrieb Simon Glass:
>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 06:39, Simon Goldschmidt
>>>>>> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This reverts commit 65a97e7fcf54feb7c4ebe1aee8a572830af4cf51.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The 'eeprom' command has been converted to work with DM_I2C in a
>>>>>>> patch
>>>>>>> submitted around the same time as this commit:
>>>>>>> commit 0c07a9b4078d ("eeprom: Add device model based I2C support to
>>>>>>> eeprom command")
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>>>> - added patch to fix DM_I2C eeprom code to work without
>>>>>>>      CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_BUS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     cmd/Kconfig | 1 -
>>>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Who will take this series? It's assigned in to Marek in patchwork, but
>>>>> might go via Heiko's i2c tree? Or directly via Tom?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have sent patches (move socfpga_vining to DM_I2C) that are based on
>>>>> this series...
>>>>
>>>> Heiko should at least AB/RB it , then I can take it via socfpga tree to
>>>> avoid dependency problems.
>>>
>>> Just add to this patches my RB tag, so please pick it up, to prevent
>>> dependency problems, thanks!
>>
>> Then put the RB tag here , so that PW can pick it :)
> 
> already done, see:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1065524/#2149315

Thanks!

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut