[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/4] clk: imx: add Kconfig entry for i.MX8MM
Peng Fan
peng.fan at nxp.com
Tue Aug 13 09:07:03 UTC 2019
Hi Lukasz,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] clk: imx: add Kconfig entry for i.MX8MM
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 5:02 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add Kconfig entry for i.MX8MM
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> > drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig index
> > a3f0171b45..fce595b4b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ config CLK_BOSTON
> >
> > config SPL_CLK_CCF
> > bool "SPL Common Clock Framework [CCF] support "
> > - depends on SPL_CLK_IMX6Q
> > + depends on SPL_CLK_IMX6Q || ARCH_IMX8M
>
> I am wondering why this depends on i.MX. Shouldn't it be SoC agnostic?
Are you ok to expose the Kconfig for all with remove the depends on?
Thanks
Peng
>
> > help
> > Enable this option if you want to (re-)use the Linux kernel's
> Common
> > Clock Framework [CCF] code in U-Boot's SPL.
> > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ config SPL_CLK_COMPOSITE_CCF
> >
> > config CLK_CCF
> > bool "Common Clock Framework [CCF] support "
> > - depends on CLK_IMX6Q || SANDBOX_CLK_CCF
> > + depends on CLK_IMX6Q || ARCH_IMX8M || SANDBOX_CLK_CCF
>
> Same here.
>
> It doesn't look like a good idea to keep expanding this Kconfig every time a
> new SoC wants to use the CCF.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list