[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/8] cmd: bootimg: Add bootimg command
Sam Protsenko
semen.protsenko at linaro.org
Mon Dec 2 20:07:15 CET 2019
Hi Eugeniu,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:17 PM Eugeniu Rosca <erosca at de.adit-jv.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:34:22PM +0300, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > +static int do_bootimg_get_dtb_file(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> > + char * const argv[])
> > +{
> > + char *endp;
> > + char buf[65];
> > + u32 index;
> > + ulong addr;
> > + u32 size;
> > +
> > + if (argc < 3 || argc > 4)
> > + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> > +
> > + index = simple_strtoul(argv[1], &endp, 0);
> > + if (*endp != '\0') {
> > + printf("Error: Wrong index\n");
> > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!android_image_get_dtb_by_index(bootimg_addr(), index, &addr,
> > + &size))
>
> As discussed in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/958594/#2302310, we
> try to enhance the "dtimg" U-Boot command to be able to identify DT
> blobs by "id" or "rev" [*] field value.
>
> It's quite challenging in this context to avoid conflicting with your
> recently proposed "bootimg" command, since the latter makes use of the
> android_image_get_dtb_by_index API, which is subject of modification
> and/or renaming.
>
> I am willing to cooperate to entirely avoid or reconcile the conflict
> in the best possible way, but for that I need your feedback.
>
I'd like this patch series to be applied ASAP (probably before DTBO
patches you mention are merged). It's been too long as it is. Once
merged and we are unblocked w.r.t. Android boot stuff, we can then
look into DTBO changes you mention, and if any C API are changed, we
can change those usage overall the U-Boot tree. Hope you agree. I will
help you guys to figure out all DTBO related changes further, but
please let's get this patch series over with...
Thanks!
> [*] https://source.android.google.cn/devices/architecture/dto/partitions
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Eugeniu
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list