[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] phy: atheros: introduce debug read and write functions
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Mon Dec 9 19:47:04 CET 2019
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Tom, Hi Joe,
>
> Am 2019-12-06 00:58, schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 12:27:39AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Hi Joe, Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > Am 2019-12-05 16:55, schrieb Joe Hershberger:
> > > > Hi Michael,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 7:28 PM Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Provide functions to read and write the Atheros debug registers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc>
> > > >
> > > > This series is adding too much size to several of the boards' SPL it
> > > > seems.
> > > >
> > > > https://travis-ci.org/jhershbe/u-boot/builds/620804934
> > > >
> > > > Please address this and resend.
> > >
> > > So first of all, this was the old series. There was a v2 series, but
> > > unfortunately, I've forgot to add the mailing to the recipients, so it
> > > never ended up in the patchwork system. sorry :(
> > >
> > > I've resend the v2 series here:
> > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=146771
> > >
> > > Now coming to the real problem here. The sizes, or like some boards
> > > handle
> > > the SPL stuff. Btw. I could not reproduce it on the
> > > am335x_boneblack_vboot
> > > board with a gcc-8. I've seen the travis ci job uses the gcc-7 so
> > > this also
> > > depends on the gcc. gcc-8 seems to produce smaller code, because on
> > > the
> > > am335x_evm the overflow was only by some 100 bytes.
> > >
> > > So taking the am335x_evm board for example. It has the following
> > > options
> > > set:
> > > CONFIG_DM_ETH=y
> > > CONFIG_SPL_NET_SUPPORT=y
> > > CONFIG_PHY_ATHEROS=y (this one is set in the config.h!)
> > >
> > > So adding a new binding for the phy obviously increases the code
> > > size. But
> > > the hard question is, how could that be fixed. IMHO the board has
> > > wrong
> > > settings. I really don't know how that could be "fixed" other than not
> > > applying this series. Well, we could make the additions conditional
> > > and
> > > introduce a new Kconfig setting, but that is a relly ugly hack and
> > > won't
> > > last long, would it? Doh!
> >
> > So, the gcc-7 from kernel.org is the min required and must work
> > toolchain. Maybe once gcc-9 is mature enough for people to have made
> > stand-alone toolchains for it we'll move up to that but gcc-8 for
> > everyone ends up being too hard. For the boneblack_vboot config, we
> > could just drop SPL networking, it's not super critical to that
> > particular example. But am335x_evm is the kitchen-sink EVM and it is
> > used and supported there.
> >
> > That said, looking over the u-boot-spl.map, it looks like nfs stuff
> > doesn't get discarded for some reason, I'm going to look in to that.
>
> So do I need to do something now? I guess removing the NFS stuff will
> make enough room to fit this. But how do we make sure, it will be applied
> with this series?
In this case, Joe has it in the -net PR right now. Thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20191209/527237a7/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list