[PATCH v3 1/6] net: introduce DSA class for Ethernet switches
Alexandru Marginean
alexm.osslist at gmail.com
Tue Dec 17 11:36:08 CET 2019
On 12/17/2019 10:41 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 09:18, Alexandru Marginean
> <alexm.osslist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/15/2019 2:08 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 17:32, Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean at nxp.com> wrote:
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * This function deals with additional devices around the switch as these should
>>>> + * have been bound to drivers by now.
>>>> + * TODO: pick up references to other switch devices here, if we're cascaded.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int dm_dsa_pre_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dsa_perdev_platdata *platdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!platdata)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (ofnode_valid(platdata->master_node))
>>>> + uclass_find_device_by_ofnode(UCLASS_ETH, platdata->master_node,
>>>> + &platdata->master_dev);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < platdata->num_ports; i++) {
>>>> + struct dsa_port_platdata *port = &platdata->port[i];
>>>> +
>>>> + if (port->dev) {
>>>> + port->dev->priv = port;
>>>> + port->phy = dm_eth_phy_connect(port->dev);
>>>
>>> Fixed-link interfaces don't work with DM_MDIO. That is somewhat
>>> natural as there is no MDIO bus for a fixed-link. However the legacy
>>> phy_connect function can be made rather easily to work with
>>> fixed-link, since it has the necessary code for dealing with it
>>> already. I am not, however, sure how it ever worked in the absence of
>>> an MDIO bus.
>>>
>>> commit 1b7e23cc7e6d0dc3fe7ae9c55390b40717ff3c3a
>>> Author: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat Dec 14 23:25:40 2019 +0200
>>>
>>> phy: make phy_connect_fixed work with a null mdio bus
>>>
>>> It is utterly pointless to require an MDIO bus pointer for a fixed PHY
>>> device. The fixed.c implementation does not require it, only
>>> phy_device_create. Fix that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>> index 80a7664e4978..8ea5c9005291 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static struct phy_device *phy_device_create(struct
>>> mii_dev *bus, int addr,
>>> dev = malloc(sizeof(*dev));
>>> if (!dev) {
>>> printf("Failed to allocate PHY device for %s:%d\n",
>>> - bus->name, addr);
>>> + bus ? bus->name : "(null bus)", addr);
>>> return NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static struct phy_device *phy_device_create(struct
>>> mii_dev *bus, int addr,
>>> return NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (addr >= 0 && addr < PHY_MAX_ADDR)
>>> + if (addr >= 0 && addr < PHY_MAX_ADDR && phy_id != PHY_FIXED_ID)
>>> bus->phymap[addr] = dev;
>>>
>>> return dev;
>>>
>>> With the patch above in place, fixed-link can also be made to work
>>> with some logic similar to what can be seen below:
>>>
>>> if (ofnode_valid(ofnode_find_subnode(port->dev->node, "fixed-link")))
>>> port->phy = phy_connect(NULL, 0, port->dev, phy_mode); //
>>> phy_mode needs to be pre-parsed somewhere else as well
>>> else
>>> port->phy = dm_eth_phy_connect(port->dev);
>>>
>>> How would you see fixed-link interfaces being treated? My question so
>>> far is in the context of front-panel ports but I am interested in your
>>> view of the CPU port situation as well.
>>
>> I was thinking turning dm_eth_phy_connect into a more generic helper
>> that also deals with fixed links, which it does not yet. That would
>
> How would you do that? Just put my snippet above in a higher-level
> wrapper over dm_eth_phy_connect and phy_connect? Otherwise I think
> it's pretty difficult and hacky to pass a null mdiodev pointer through
> dm_mdio_phy_connect.
It wouldn't go through mdio_phy_connect, dm_eth_phy_connect would need
to figure out if it's a fixed link or PHY and then call the proper
function, like in your snippet.
The MDIO NULL topic is a bit more complicated I think. Some of the Eth
drivers just deal with fixed link internally and don't create a phy
device at all. If there is a PHY device I think we need to have a MDIO
bus for it, and we shouldn't piggy-back on real MDIO buses. I'm
thinking we could have a dummy MDIO bus created automatically by
ETH/MDIO uclass code for fixed link PHY devices.
Thoughts?
Alex
>
>> move the "fixed-link" if out of the driver code. Ideally the driver
>> should be able to call a single helper and, if the device has a DT node,
>> it would get back a PHY handle to either a proper PHY or to a fixed link
>> (from phy_connect_fixed).
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>>
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Vladimir
>>>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list