[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/13] mmc: sdhci: Make set_ios_post() return int
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Wed Jan 30 02:20:02 UTC 2019
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:15:27PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Make set_ios_post() return int to faciliate error handling in
> platform drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz4000 at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/sdhci.c | 6 +++++-
> drivers/mmc/xenon_sdhci.c | 4 +++-
> include/sdhci.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
> index 635f5396c4..b7b7ff6f7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
> @@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static int sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc)
> #endif
> u32 ctrl;
> struct sdhci_host *host = mmc->priv;
> + int ret;
>
> if (host->ops && host->ops->set_control_reg)
> host->ops->set_control_reg(host);
> @@ -500,8 +501,11 @@ static int sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc)
> sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL);
>
> /* If available, call the driver specific "post" set_ios() function */
> - if (host->ops && host->ops->set_ios_post)
> + if (host->ops && host->ops->set_ios_post) {
> host->ops->set_ios_post(host);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
Isn't something going to complain about either unused or uninitialized
(or, both) variables? In fact, re-reading this and follow-up patches, I
think you forgot to turn:
host->ops->set_ios_post(host);
in to:
ret = host->ops->set_ios_post(host);
above. And could probably simplfy the whole thing to:
if (host->ops && host->ops->set_ios_post)
return host->ops->set_ios_post(host);
return 0;
Or is there more to the function that I'm missing? That's just based on
the patch context alone.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190129/b9183b75/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list