[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: dts: am33xx: add u-boot, dm-spl to ocp bus
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Thu Jan 31 20:25:18 UTC 2019
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:18:01PM +0100, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
>
> On 1/31/19 4:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:48:10PM +0100, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
> >
> >>On 1/31/19 3:57 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:03:19AM +0100, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>commit fdce9d35dc36 ("arm: dts: am33xx: Sync dts with Linux 4.20.0")
> >>>>did remove the "u-boot,dm-spl" flag from the 'ocp' bus which was
> >>>>introduced with
> >>>>commit 19aa4ac09db9 ("dts: am33xx: add u-boot, dm-spl to ocp bus")
> >>>>
> >>>>Due to this the brppt1_spi board is broken because it cannot
> >>>>bind/probe the spi-interface during SPL stage.
> >>>>
> >>>>This commit adds this flag again.
> >>>>
> >>>>This flag is needed for having access to the devices below this bus,
> >>>>most important is uart and boot-device (spi, mmc, ...) in SPL stage.
> >>>>
> >>>>Signed-off-by: Hannes Schmelzer <hannes.schmelzer at br-automation.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>---
> >>>>
> >>>> arch/arm/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 1 +
> >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>>
> >>>>diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/am33xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> >>>>index d3dd6a1..0a6b177 100644
> >>>>--- a/arch/arm/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> >>>>+++ b/arch/arm/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> >>>>@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@
> >>>> * the whole bus hierarchy.
> >>>> */
> >>>> ocp {
> >>>>+ u-boot,dm-spl;
> >>>> compatible = "simple-bus";
> >>>> #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>> #size-cells = <1>;
> >>>We need to put this into one of the -u-boot.dtsi files and then #include
> >>>it from the others, so that we don't keep dropping this flag. Thanks!
> >>Hi Tom,
> >>i'm not sure if we can do that this way because the "ocp" bus has no valid
> >>label like other elements.
> >>So we have at least to adjust the am33xx.dtsi file like this:
> >>
> >> ocp : ocp {
> >> compatible = "simple-bus";
> >> .....
> >> }
> >>
> >>what do you suggest ?
> >Er, with the example of arch/arm/dts/am335x-pdu001-u-boot.dtsi should't
> >we be able to just do that, globally? Or is that part _not_ working and
> >relied on the now removed hunk?
> Hi Tom,
> I'll verify this tomorrow. But the pdu001 looks good to me.
> This would be a solution for my boards too if it does the job.
> Keep you up to date.
Thanks. Just keep in mind that if it works, we need am33xx-u-boot.dtsi
with that, so it unbreaks all the SoC.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190131/674f451b/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list