[U-Boot] [RFC 2/2] sandbox: Update dts files

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 15:33, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> With a more modern dtc we now get lots of warnings about problems with
> the sandbox dts files and then in turn the DM tests.  Start addressing
> these warnings by using, or not using in some cases, addresses on nodes
> and update tests to match.
>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> ---
> Please note that this is not enough.  A few tests are still failing for
> the main test.dtb run and I don't see the obvious correction.  I also
> largely left sandbox64 untouched but it too needs changes.
> ---
>  arch/sandbox/dts/sandbox.dts   | 22 ++++++++++----------
>  arch/sandbox/dts/sandbox64.dts |  2 +-
>  arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts      | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  include/sandbox-adc.h          |  2 +-
>  test/dm/pmic.c                 |  2 +-
>  test/dm/spmi.c                 |  2 +-
>  6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

Thanks for looking at this. Note that dm/next has some updates so you
should base on that (e.g. a common sandbox.dtsi).

I wonder what warnings you get with the simple 0/1/2 addresses?

Regards,
Simon