[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] NXP LS1021A-TSN Board

[Joe Hershberger]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Joe,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN board,
> > > > > an evaluation platform built in partnership with VVDN/Argonboards
> > > > > for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features.
> > > > >
> > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from OpenIL,
> > > > > as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH.  I picked up Bin Meng's
> > > > > patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board, same SoC):
> > > > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-May/330096.html
> > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made a
> > > > > few adjustments where necessary.
> > > > >
> > > > > TODO items:
> > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary
> > > > >   for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port)
> > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch
> > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and
> > > > >   expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging),
> > > > >   once https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371563.html
> > > > >   is merged.
> > > >
> > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do that
> > > > migration now or do it sometime later?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that
> > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again.
> >
> > Sounds good.
> > Thanks,
> > -Joe
> >
>
> What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the
> patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to
> be?

Since the vast majority of the series is the Ethernet changes, I was
planning to take it.

Thanks,
-Joe