[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Dockerfile: build GRUB UEFI targets

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 08:04:15PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 7/29/19 3:07 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:43:37AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> >>Build GRUB UEFI targets grubarm.efi and grubaa64.efi. These are needed for
> >>running test_efi_grub_net().
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
> >
> >Next step, update the CI hook scripts to use these files, and copy them
> >in the .gitlab-ci.yml file.  Stephen has moved these to the DENX GitLab
> >as well, btw.
> 
> I guess you refer to https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot-test-hooks.
> 
> I think we have to keep Travis CI alive for developers who can not run
> anything on GitLab. So will
> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot-test-hooks and
> https://github.com/swarren/uboot-test-hooks.git now diverge?

The intention is to leverage our new gitlab instance to make it easier
to find the related parts of the overall project.  Stephen owns the
gitlab repository and I think he intends long term to have his github
one become just a personal repo.  Travis (and GitLab) should get
migrated.

> A better idea would be to let .gitlab-ci.yml and .travis.yml use the
> same Dockerimage.
> 
> We simply have to push our docker image to Dockerhub.
> 
> Usage of Docker images with Travis CI is described here:
> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/docker/

So, I personally would like to phase out Travis as it's both a bit of a
maintenance burden and the network failures are annoying.  But, it's
good to know that Travis can use a custom Docker image.  We currently
publish the runner image so moving the travis job to use that instead
would be good and I'd appreciate patches.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190729/be87888b/attachment.sig>