[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] regulator: bd71837: copy the bd71837 pmic
Matti.Vaittinen at fi.rohmeurope.com
Thu Jun 13 08:33:08 UTC 2019
Hello Jaehoon and Stefano,
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 12:58 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Maitti,
> On 12/06/19 12:24, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > Hello Stefano,
> > On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 11:40 +0200, sbabic at denx.de wrote:
> > > > https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/uboot-imx
> > > > cherry picked, styled and merged commits:
> > > > - MLK-18387 pmic: Add pmic driver for BD71837: e9a3bec2e95a
> > > > - MLK-18590 pmic: bd71837: Change to use new fdt API:
> > > > acdc5c297a96
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ye Li <ye.li at nxp.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <
> > > > matti.vaittinen at fi.rohmeurope.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > >
> > > Applied to u-boot-imx, master, thanks !
> > Thanks for merging the patch :]
> > Do you think the 2/2 could also be taken in?
> The thing is that I did not know why patches were assigned to me. 1/2
> was just defines and I decided to merge it instead of postpone it.
> is the driver, and should flow into power tree (maintainer is
> even if this is thought for i.MX8. It is enough to me to get an ACK
> Jaehoon to merge into u-boot-imx, if Jaehonn agrees.
Allright. The BD71837 and BD71847 are indeed intended to be used for
powering the i.MX8. I don't expect them to be used too much for other
SoCs - so that might be the reason the patches were assignrd to you in
first place. I know few people who are using the BD71837 and would be
happy seeing the driver in u-Boot ;) So Jaehoon, how do you see this?
Is the driver Ok to go in Stefano's tree? Should I take some action
like resending the 2/2?
More information about the U-Boot