[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] regulator: bd71837: copy the bd71837 pmic

[Vaittinen, Matti]

Hello Jaehoon,

On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 11:33 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Hello Jaehoon and Stefano,
> 
> On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 12:58 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > Hi Maitti,
> > 
> > On 12/06/19 12:24, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > Hello Stefano,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 11:40 +0200, sbabic at denx.de wrote:
> > > > > https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/uboot-imx
> > > > > cherry picked, styled and merged commits:
> > > > > - MLK-18387 pmic: Add pmic driver for BD71837: e9a3bec2e95a
> > > > > - MLK-18590 pmic: bd71837: Change to use new fdt API:
> > > > > acdc5c297a96
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ye Li <ye.li at nxp.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <
> > > > > matti.vaittinen at fi.rohmeurope.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Applied to u-boot-imx, master, thanks !
> > > 
> > > Thanks for merging the patch :]
> > > Do you think the 2/2 could also be taken in?
> > > 
> > 
> > The thing is that I did not know why patches were assigned to me.
> > 1/2
> > was just defines and I decided to merge it instead of postpone it.
> > 2/2
> > is the driver, and should flow into power tree (maintainer is
> > Jaehoon),
> > even if this is thought for i.MX8. It is enough to me to get an ACK
> > by
> > Jaehoon to merge into u-boot-imx, if Jaehonn agrees.
> 
> Allright. The BD71837 and BD71847 are indeed intended to be used for
> powering the i.MX8. I don't expect them to be used too much for other
> SoCs - so that might be the reason the patches were assignrd to you
> in
> first place. I know few people who are using the BD71837 and would be
> happy seeing the driver in u-Boot ;) So Jaehoon, how do you see this?
> Is the driver Ok to go in Stefano's tree? Should I take some action
> like resending the 2/2?

Just a gentle ping :) Should I resend the 2/2?

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen