[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] bouncebuf: Add DMA validation check to addr_aligned().
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Tue May 7 13:53:41 UTC 2019
On 5/7/19 3:52 PM, Christoph Müllner wrote:
>
>
> On 5/7/19 3:48 PM, Christoph Müllner wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07.05.19 15:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 5/7/19 11:05 AM, Christoph Muellner wrote:
>>>> Currently addr_aligned() performs an alignment and a length check
>>>> to validate the DMA address. However, some machines have stricter
>>>> restrictions of DMA-able addresses.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a call to mach_addr_is_dmaable() to honor this
>>>> machine specific restrictions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner at theobroma-systems.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> common/bouncebuf.c | 6 ++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/common/bouncebuf.c b/common/bouncebuf.c
>>>> index a7098e2caf..26ddf30ea2 100644
>>>> --- a/common/bouncebuf.c
>>>> +++ b/common/bouncebuf.c
>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ static int addr_aligned(struct bounce_buffer *state)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + /* Check if valid DMA address. */
>>>> + if (!mach_addr_is_dmaable((ulong)state->user_buffer)) {
>>>
>>> Is the cast necessary ?
>>
>> Of course not.
>> Will be fixed in v2.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> I take that back.
> The cast is needed.
> (And also done several times in this file)
>
> Otherwise you will get:
>
> common/bouncebuf.c: In function ‘addr_aligned’:
> common/bouncebuf.c:35:33: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘mach_addr_is_dmaable’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> if (!mach_addr_is_dmaable(state->user_buffer)) {
> ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/common.h:64,
> from common/bouncebuf.c:8:
> include/init.h:128:40: note: expected ‘long unsigned int’ but argument is of type ‘void *’
> int mach_addr_is_dmaable(unsigned long addr);
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
Shouldn't the function use void __iomem * in the first place ?
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list