[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 01/13] clk: doc: Add documentation entry for Common Clock Framework [CCF] (i.MX)
Lukasz Majewski
lukma at denx.de
Thu May 16 22:10:30 UTC 2019
This patch describes the design decisions considerations and taken approach
for porting in a separate documentation entry.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de>
---
Changes in v4:
- New patch
Changes in v3: None
doc/imx/clk/ccf.txt | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 doc/imx/clk/ccf.txt
diff --git a/doc/imx/clk/ccf.txt b/doc/imx/clk/ccf.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cc167095f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/imx/clk/ccf.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Introduction:
+=============
+
+This documentation entry describes the Common Clock Framework [CCF]
+port from Linux kernel (5.0-rc3) to U-Boot.
+
+This code is supposed to bring CCF to IMX based devices (imx6q, imx7
+imx8). Moreover, it also provides some common clock code, which would
+allow easy porting of CCF Linux code to other platforms.
+
+Design decisions:
+=================
+
+* U-boot's DM for clk differs from Linux CCF. The most notably difference
+ is the lack of support for hierarchical clocks and "clock as a manager
+ driver" (single clock DTS node acts as a starting point for all other
+ clocks).
+
+* The clk_get_rate() caches the previously read data if CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE
+ is not set (no need for recursive access).
+
+* On purpose the "manager" clk driver (clk-imx6q.c) is not using large
+ table to store pointers to clocks - e.g. clk[IMX6QDL_CLK_USDHC2_SEL] = ....
+ Instead we use udevice's linked list for the same class (UCLASS_CLK).
+
+ Rationale:
+ ----------
+ When porting the code as is from Linux, one would need ~1KiB of RAM to
+ store it. This is way too much if we do plan to use this driver in SPL.
+
+* The "central" structure of this patch series is struct udevice and its
+ driver_data field contains the struct clk pointer (to the originally created
+ one).
+
+* Up till now U-boot's driver model's CLK operates on udevice (main access to
+ clock is by udevice ops)
+ In the CCF the access to struct clk (comprising pointer to *dev) is
+ possible via dev_get_driver_data()
+
+ Storing back pointer (from udevice to struct clk) as driver_data is a
+ convention for CCF.
+
+* I could use *private_alloc_size to allocate driver's 'private"
+ structures (dev->priv) for e.g. divider (struct clk_divider *divider)
+ for IMX6Q clock, but this would change the original structure of the CCF code.
+
+ Question:
+ ---------
+
+ Would it be better to use private_alloc_size (and dev->private) or stay with
+ driver_data to store struct clk pointer?
+
+ The former requires some rewritting in CCF original code (to remove
+ (c)malloc, etc), but comply with u-boot DM. The latter allows re-using the
+ CCF code as is, but introduces some convention special for CCF (I'm not
+ sure thought if dev->priv is NOT another convention as well).
+
+ This port uses the former approach with driver_data storing pointer to
+ struct clk.
+
+* I've added the clk_get_parent(), which reads parent's dev->driver_data to
+ provide parent's struct clk pointer. This seems the easiest way to get
+ child/parent relationship for struct clk in U-boot's udevice
+ based clocks.
+
+* For tests I had to "emulate" CCF code structure to test functionality of
+ clk_get_parent_rate() and clk_get_by_id(). Those functions will not work
+ properly with "standard" (i.e. non CCF) clock setup (with not set
+ dev->driver_data to struct clk).
+
+* Linux's CCF 'struct clk_core' corresponds to u-boot's udevice in 'struct clk'.
+ Clock IP block agnostic flags from 'struct clk_core' (e.g. NOCACHE) have been
+ moved from this struct one level up to 'struct clk'.
+
+To do:
+------
+
+* Use of OF_PLATDATA in the SPL setup for CCF - as it is now - the SPL grows
+ considerably and using CCF in boards with tiny resources (OCRAM) is
+ problematic.
+
+* On demand port other parts of CCF to U-Boot - as now only features _really_
+ needed by DM/DTS converted drivers are used.
--
2.11.0
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list