[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] fdt: Allow indicating a node is for U-Boot proper only

[Patrick DELAUNAY]

Hi Simon,


> 
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 07:34, Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay at st.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > > From: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > > Sent: lundi 11 février 2019 12:58
> > >
> > > On 2/11/19 12:56 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> > > > Hi Marek and Simon
> > > >
> > > >> From: Patrick DELAUNAY
> > > >> Sent: vendredi 8 février 2019 13:47
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Marek,
> > > >>
> > > >>> From: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > > >>> Sent: jeudi 7 février 2019 18:48
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 2/7/19 6:40 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> > > >>>> Hi Marek,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> From: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > > >>>>> Sent: mardi 5 février 2019 09:55
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 2/4/19 3:40 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 03:15, Patrick Delaunay
> > > >>>>>> <patrick.delaunay at st.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This add missing parts for previous commit 06f94461a9f4
> > > >>>>>>> ("fdt: Allow indicating a node is for U-Boot proper only")
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> At present it is not possible to specify that a node should
> > > >>>>>>> be used before relocation (in U-Boot proper) without it also
> > > >>>>>>> ending up in SPL and TPL device trees. Add a new "u-boot,dm-pre-
> proper"
> > > >>>>>>> boolean property
> > > >>>>> for this.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay at st.com>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > > ...
> > > >>>> NB: we could also remove the tags
> > > >>>> u-boot,dm-pre-reloc/u-boot,dm-spl
> > > >>>> : we
> > > >>> can gain place in spl dtb
> > > >>>>        These tags are not needed as binding is mandatory in SPL
> > > >>>> build for ALL
> > > >>> node  present in SPL device tree
> > > >>>>       others node are cleaned by fdtgrep (but impact in SPL
> > > >>>> code)
> > > >>
> > > >> Finally I will sent a patch for this proposal (today I hope) =>
> > > >> On my board stm32mp1-ev1, the SPL device tree is reduced by 790
> > > >> bytes
> > > >
> > > > FYI: patch sent with http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1039756/
> 
> That patch was applied.
> 
> But what is the status of this patch, and the second one in this series?
> 
> If these are still needed can you please resend them, rebased?

Yes , I need to sent a update.
I finish just it (include tests) Friday, I will sent it today

> Regards,
> Simon

Regards
Patrick