[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] riscv: andes_plic: Fix some wrong configurations

[Rick Chen]

Hi Anup

> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:42 PM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:30 AM Alan Kao <alankao at andestech.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Bin,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the critics.  Comments below.
> > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 06:38:00PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > > Hi Rick,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:50 AM Rick Chen <rickchen36 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Bin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Rick,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:18 PM Andes <uboot at andestech.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: Rick Chen <rick at andestech.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It will work fine due to hart 0 always will be main
> > > > > > > > hart coincidentally. When develop SPL flow, I try to
> > > > > > > > force other harts to be main hart. And it will go
> > > > > > > > wrong in sending IPI flow. So fix it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fix what? Does this commit contain 2 fixes, or just 1 fix?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, it include two fixs. But they will cause one negative result
> > > > > > that only hart 0 can send ipi to other harts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Having this fix, any hart can be main hart in U-Boot SPL
> > > > > > > > theoretically, but it still fail somewhere. After dig in
> > > > > > > > and found there is an assumption that hart 0 shall be
> > > > > > > > main hart in OpenSbi.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So does this mean there is a bug in OpenSBI too?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not sure if it is a bug. Maybe it is a compatible issue.
> > > > > > There is a limitation that only hart 0 can be main hart in OpenSBI.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think OpenSBI has such limitation.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please check the source.
> > > > https://github.com/riscv/opensbi/blob/master/firmware/fw_base.S#L54
> > > >
> > > > Apparently, the FIRST TWO LINEs of the initialization are the
> > > > 1. get hart ID.
> > > > 2. determine which route to take based on their ID respectively.
> > > >
> > > > So, I do think OpenSBI has this signature, if you are not willing to call it
> > > > a limitation.
> > >
> > > This dependency on hart id #0 was not there until we added self-relocation
> > > in OpenSBI for FW_DYNAMIC.
> > >
> > > I will try to fix this in OpenSBI but we might end-up having boot_lottery.
> >
> > I have send a patch to fix this OpenSBI:
> > "[PATCH] firmware: Introduce relocation lottery"
> >
> > Can you try above patch and see if that helps ?
> >
> > It will be great if you can provide Tested-by to my patch as well.
> >
>

I can not find this patch in mailing list.
Can you provide a hyperlink ?

Thanks
Rick