[U-Boot] [GIT] Pull request: u-boot-dfu (06.11.2019)

[Marek Vasut]

On 11/6/19 1:27 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,

>> On 11/6/19 12:27 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>   
>>>> On 11/6/19 10:21 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:  
>>>>> Dear Marek,
>>>>>
>>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>>> 14d39c9e1dc9397febd58399a70f32e7481bbc27:
>>>>>
>>>>>   travis: Rework how we write the ~/.buildman file (2019-11-05
>>>>> 10:44:16 -0500)
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>>
>>>>>   git at gitlab.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu.git 
>>>>>
>>>>> BRANCH: master
>>>>> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/commits/master
>>>>>
>>>>> Merge TAG:
>>>>> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/tags/u-boot-dfu-06Nov2019
>>>>>
>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to
>>>>> 8c5df588e89b2bf4aad4c95b17cfc8634b8dcaaf:
>>>>>
>>>>>   usb: composite: add BOS descriptor support to composite
>>>>> framework (2019-11-06 01:01:06 +0100)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My remark:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Those patches are new code, (like adding the USB 3.0 controller
>>>>> from Cadence) hence IMHO it would be best to add them to your next
>>>>> PR    
>>>>
>>>> We are already in -rc cycle, so fixes only. Should this PR be for
>>>> -next ?
>>>>  
>>>
>>> The BOS support is a fix do SS USB.
>>>
>>> And the Cadence USB support is a new code, which is not touching any
>>> relevant parts of USB (and IMHO it applies to the same category as
>>> adding new boards outside the merge window).
>>>
>>> However, if you believe that this code is not eligible for
>>> u-boot-usb/master ,then yes please pull it into -next.  
>>
>> That decision is up to you. If you think this is safe to pull in RC1,
>> I don't mind either way.
> 
> Ok. Lets then pull it in RC1. Thanks for understanding :-)

Pulled, thanks.