[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: allow DRAM init in SPL and fix ordering
Kever Yang
kever.yang at rock-chips.com
Fri Nov 15 01:16:57 UTC 2019
Hi Thomas,
On 2019/11/15 上午12:09, Tom Hebb wrote:
> Hi Kever,
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:25 AM Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com
> <mailto:kever.yang at rock-chips.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 2019/11/11 上午12:25, Thomas Hebb wrote:
> > b7abef2ecbcc ("rockchip: rk3399: Migrate to use common spl board
> file")
> > removed SoC-specific code for RK3399's SPL and in the process
> introduced
> > two regressions:
> >
> > 1. It caused the previously-unconditional DRAM initialization in
> > board_init_f() to only happen when compiling a
> configuration that
> > did not support TPL, meaning DRAM would never get
> initialized if TPL
> > was supported but disabled.
>
>
> If the board support TPL, that means the dram init should be done in
> TPL, no matter the really
>
> implement is the U-Boot TPL or use rockchip rkbin instead. In this
> case,
> enable DRAM driver in SPL
>
> make no sense, for dram driver itself would only get dram size
> which do
> not have any use other
>
> than the case CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT.
>
>
> I would like to boot my RK3399 board with only an SPL, loaded directly
> by the.
> BootROM into IRAM. I have no need for a three-stage bootloader, and adding
> only increases boot time and adds complexity. Is there a reason not to
> support
> this use case?
OK, I understand it now, you update is necessary, thanks.
Well, it will be better to make this patch into two patches.
>
> I do realize that this will add an unnecessary call if someone uses
> rkbin for DDR
> init and SPL for the second stage. Do any boards actually do that, though?
>
> > 2. It reordered the DRAM initialization before
> rockchip_stimer_init(),
> > which as far as I can tell causes RK3399 to lock up completely.
>
>
> The stimer_init should goes before dram_init.
>
> So please only update the order.
>
>
> Should timer_init() also go before dram_init(), like I have it now? Or
> should I put
> dram_init() between rockchip_stimer_init() and timer_init()?
timer_init() goes before dram_init, because the dram_init() will use
udelay().
Thanks,
- Kever
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Kever
>
> >
> > Fix both of these issues in the common code so that we can again
> boot
> > RK3399 without a TPL. This fixes custom configurations that have
> > disabled TPL, and it should also unbreak the "ficus-rk3399",
> > "rock960-rk3399", and "chromebook_bob" defconfigs, although since I
> > don't have any of those devices I can't confirm they're broken now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hebb <tommyhebb at gmail.com
> <mailto:tommyhebb at gmail.com>>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl.c
> > index 92102b39e7..089f0a5258 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl.c
> > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ __weak int arch_cpu_init(void)
> > void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > -#if !defined(CONFIG_SUPPORT_TPL) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_TPL) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
> > struct udevice *dev;
> > #endif
> >
> > @@ -128,20 +128,20 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> > hang();
> > }
> > arch_cpu_init();
> > -#if !defined(CONFIG_SUPPORT_TPL) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
> > - debug("\nspl:init dram\n");
> > - ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_RAM, 0, &dev);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - printf("DRAM init failed: %d\n", ret);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -#endif
> > #if !defined(CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3188)
> > rockchip_stimer_init();
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_ARCH_TIMER
> > /* Init ARM arch timer in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/arch_timer.c */
> > timer_init();
> > +#endif
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_TPL) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
> > + debug("\nspl:init dram\n");
> > + ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_RAM, 0, &dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + printf("DRAM init failed: %d\n", ret);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > #endif
> > preloader_console_init();
> > }
>
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list