[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] efi_loader: enable EFI_LOADER on arm1136 and arm1176

Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Tue Nov 19 18:11:46 UTC 2019


On 11/19/19 4:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 04:35:57AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> With an implementation for allow_unaligned() available for arm1136 and
>> arm1176 UEFI can be supported on these architectures.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
>> ---
>>   lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 6 ++++--
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
>> index 2f40e485ef..7984d6f42d 100644
>> --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
>>   config EFI_LOADER
>>   	bool "Support running UEFI applications"
>>   	depends on OF_LIBFDT && ( \
>> -		ARM && (SYS_CPU = armv7 || \
>> -			SYS_CPU = armv8) || \
>> +		ARM && (SYS_CPU = arm1136 || \
>> +			SYS_CPU = arm1176 || \
>> +			SYS_CPU = armv7   || \
>> +			SYS_CPU = armv8)  || \
>>   		X86 || RISCV || SANDBOX)
>>   	# We need EFI_STUB_64BIT to be set on x86_64 with EFI_STUB
>>   	depends on !EFI_STUB || !X86_64 || EFI_STUB_64BIT
>
> My concern is that while it's goodk and important we're correcting the
> dependencies for ARM, non-ARMv7 hardware is much more legacy than new
> design and we maybe don't want to have it enabled by default there.  One
> of the biggest pieces of feedback I have gotten over the overall EFI
> support is that it being on by default on legacy systems causes a lot of
> unwanted size growth.  Does Kconfig work sanely with something like:
> 	default y if !ARM
> 	default y if ARM && (SYS_CPU = armv7 || SYS_CPU == arv8)
> ?  Then we could allow other older ARM systems to enable it still and
> now function (again, good work) without the size growth by default.
> Thanks!

These are the only ARM11 boards:

evb-ast2500_defconfig
flea3_defconfig
integratorcp_cm1136_defconfig
mx31pdk_defconfig
mx35pdk_defconfig
rpi_0_w_defconfig
rpi_defconfig
woodburn_defconfig
woodburn_sd_defconfig

Which one poses a problem?

Best regards

Heinrich


More information about the U-Boot mailing list