[U-Boot] [PATCH] bootm: vxworks: Support Linux compatible standard DTB for ARM and PPC

[Soeren Moch]

On 27.11.19 13:55, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:03:03PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:22 PM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:11:00AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:21 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Lihua Zhao <lihua.zhao at windriver.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Enhance do_bootm_vxworks() to support Linux compatible standard DTB
>>>>> for ARM and PPC, when the least significant bit of flags in VxWorks
>>>>> bootargs is set. Otherwise it falls back to the existing bootm flow
>>>>> which is now legacy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lihua Zhao <lihua.zhao at windriver.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>  common/bootm_os.c  | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>  doc/README.vxworks | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>>  include/vxworks.h  |  3 +++
>>>>>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>> It would be good if you pick this up for v2020.01. Thanks!
>>> OK, thanks.  I'll put this on my TODO list for soon.
>> A gentle ping?
> So the issue now is that this causes size growth and then link failure
> on tbs2910.  And I don't think "boot modern VxWorks kernels" is a new
> CONFIG option I want to see.  So I'm not quite sure what to do here yet.
> Soeren, do you care about VxWorks support on this platform?  Thanks!
>
I'm not aware of any user of VxWorks on tbs2910. So would be OK for me
to disable CONFIG_BOOTM_VXWORKS in tbs2910_defconfig.

Do you want me to send a patch for this? Has this to go through the imx
tree? I'm also happy to send an Acked-by instead, if this makes things
easier.

Regards,
Soeren