[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells()

Simon Glass sjg at google.com
Fri Oct 11 18:28:59 UTC 2019


Hi Matthias,

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 07:31, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 28/09/2019 01:28, sjg at google.com wrote:
> > From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
> >
> > Add internal fdt_cells() to avoid copy and paste. Fix typo in
> > fdt_size_cells() documentation comment.
> >
> > This is based in upstream commit:
> > c12b2b0 ("libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells()")
> > but misses the test cases, as we don't implement them in U-Boot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 35 +++++++++++-------------------
> >  scripts/dtc/libfdt/libfdt.h        |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied to u-boot-dm/next, thanks!
>
> I just looked through the upstream U-Boot commit log and don't see them queued
> for 2019.10-rc5
> Do I understand correctly that you are planning to merge them after 2019.10 is
> released. Correct?
>
> I'm asking because without these patches the grub boot path for RPi4 with RAM >
> 1GB is 'broken', in the sense that the kernel will only see RAM size of 1GB.
>
> I can keep them as backports in openSUSE, that's no problem, just wanted to know
> what's your plan. And have a quick answer if someone asks on the mailinglist :)
>

Yes that's right. Should get these applied next week.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list