[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells()

[Matthias Brugger]

On 11/10/2019 20:28, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 07:31, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 28/09/2019 01:28, sjg at google.com wrote:
>>> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
>>>
>>> Add internal fdt_cells() to avoid copy and paste. Fix typo in
>>> fdt_size_cells() documentation comment.
>>>
>>> This is based in upstream commit:
>>> c12b2b0 ("libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells()")
>>> but misses the test cases, as we don't implement them in U-Boot.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 35 +++++++++++-------------------
>>>  scripts/dtc/libfdt/libfdt.h        |  2 +-
>>>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Applied to u-boot-dm/next, thanks!
>>
>> I just looked through the upstream U-Boot commit log and don't see them queued
>> for 2019.10-rc5
>> Do I understand correctly that you are planning to merge them after 2019.10 is
>> released. Correct?
>>
>> I'm asking because without these patches the grub boot path for RPi4 with RAM >
>> 1GB is 'broken', in the sense that the kernel will only see RAM size of 1GB.
>>
>> I can keep them as backports in openSUSE, that's no problem, just wanted to know
>> what's your plan. And have a quick answer if someone asks on the mailinglist :)
>>
> 
> Yes that's right. Should get these applied next week.
> 

Ok, thanks for the info :)