[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: invert the is_running() return value

[Fabien DESSENNE]

On 11/10/2019 10:00 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 10/9/19 10:36 AM, Fabien Dessenne wrote:
>> The .is_running() ops expects a return value of 0 if the processor is
>> running, 1 if not running : align to this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne at st.com>
> This patch should be earlier than patch4, right?


You're probably right. I will double check this in v2.


>
> Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
>> index eef3416..fce9653 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
>> @@ -237,14 +237,14 @@ static int stm32_copro_stop(struct udevice *dev)
>>   /**
>>    * stm32_copro_is_running() - Is the STM32 remote processor running
>>    * @dev:	corresponding STM32 remote processor device
>> - * @return 1 if the remote processor is running, 0 otherwise
>> + * @return 0 if the remote processor is running, 1 otherwise
>>    */
>>   static int stm32_copro_is_running(struct udevice *dev)
>>   {
>>   	struct stm32_copro_privdata *priv;
>>   
>>   	priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
>> -	return priv->is_running;
>> +	return !priv->is_running;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static const struct dm_rproc_ops stm32_copro_ops = {
>>