[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] stm32mp1: configs: Add CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_MTD

[Schrempf Frieder]

Hi Jagan,

On 16.10.19 18:34, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:18 AM Schrempf Frieder
> <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de> wrote:
>>
>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>
>>
>> As SPI_FLASH_MTD is used in SPL and U-Boot proper, we enable both,
>> now that a separate option for SPL was introduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>
>> ---
>>   configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig b/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig
>> index 09785b5dc1..390319657f 100644
>> --- a/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig
>> +++ b/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig
>> @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ CONFIG_TARGET_STM32MP1=y
>>   CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
>>   CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
>>   # CONFIG_ARMV7_VIRT is not set
>> +CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x2FFC2500
>>   CONFIG_DISTRO_DEFAULTS=y
>>   CONFIG_FIT=y
>>   CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND="run bootcmd_stm32mp"
>> -CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x2FFC2500
> 
> Unrelated change wrt to commit message?

Yes, this is unrelated, but that's what 'menuconfig' and 'savedefconfig' 
gave me as output. So I would think it's ok. If you don't think so, feel 
free to remove this change or let me know if I should remove it.

Thanks,
Frieder