[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] stm32mp1: configs: Add CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_MTD

[Schrempf Frieder]

Hi Jagan,

On 17.10.19 08:42, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
> 
> On 16.10.19 18:34, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:18 AM Schrempf Frieder
>> <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>
>>>
>>> As SPI_FLASH_MTD is used in SPL and U-Boot proper, we enable both,
>>> now that a separate option for SPL was introduced.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>
>>> ---
>>>   configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig | 3 ++-
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig 
>>> b/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig
>>> index 09785b5dc1..390319657f 100644
>>> --- a/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig
>>> +++ b/configs/stm32mp15_basic_defconfig
>>> @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ CONFIG_TARGET_STM32MP1=y
>>>   CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
>>>   CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
>>>   # CONFIG_ARMV7_VIRT is not set
>>> +CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x2FFC2500
>>>   CONFIG_DISTRO_DEFAULTS=y
>>>   CONFIG_FIT=y
>>>   CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND="run bootcmd_stm32mp"
>>> -CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x2FFC2500
>>
>> Unrelated change wrt to commit message?
> 
> Yes, this is unrelated, but that's what 'menuconfig' and 'savedefconfig' 
> gave me as output. So I would think it's ok. If you don't think so, feel 
> free to remove this change or let me know if I should remove it.

In patchwork all three patches of this series are marked with "Changes 
Requested". Can you please let me know what needs to be fixed?

Thanks,
Frieder