[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix default values for address and size cells

[Simon Glass]

Hi Matthias,

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:57, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias.bgg at kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
> >
> > The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the
> > upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells
> > was wrong. This series fixes this by backporting the corresponding
> > patches from the upstream project.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - fix spelling of U-Boot (patch 1 + 2 /4)
> > - add Reviewed-by tag (patch 1/4)
> > - fix the case of size-cells == 0 (patch 3/4)
> > - fix default address cells for livetree (patch 4/4)
> >
> > v1 can be found here:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137331/
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137330/
> >
> >
> > Matthias Brugger (4):
> >   libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells()
> >   libfdt: return correct value if #size-cells property is not present
> >   libfdt: Allow #size-cells of 0
> >   dm: Fix default address cells return value
> >
> >  include/dm/of.h                    |  2 +-
> >  scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  scripts/dtc/libfdt/libfdt.h        |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Any comments on this? I tried to find your custodian tree, but wasn't able to do
> so and check if you took it already.

This was applied. Did you not get the emails on each patch?

Regards,
Simon