[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix default values for address and size cells

[Matthias Brugger]

On 22/10/2019 01:47, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:57, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias.bgg at kernel.org wrote:
>>> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
>>>
>>> The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the
>>> upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells
>>> was wrong. This series fixes this by backporting the corresponding
>>> patches from the upstream project.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - fix spelling of U-Boot (patch 1 + 2 /4)
>>> - add Reviewed-by tag (patch 1/4)
>>> - fix the case of size-cells == 0 (patch 3/4)
>>> - fix default address cells for livetree (patch 4/4)
>>>
>>> v1 can be found here:
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137331/
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137330/
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthias Brugger (4):
>>>   libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells()
>>>   libfdt: return correct value if #size-cells property is not present
>>>   libfdt: Allow #size-cells of 0
>>>   dm: Fix default address cells return value
>>>
>>>  include/dm/of.h                    |  2 +-
>>>  scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>  scripts/dtc/libfdt/libfdt.h        |  2 +-
>>>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Any comments on this? I tried to find your custodian tree, but wasn't able to do
>> so and check if you took it already.
> 
> This was applied. Did you not get the emails on each patch?
> 

I got emails saying that they were applied to u-boot-dm/next, but wasn't able to
find that branch.

Seeing it now, not sure if I didn't look correctly. Anyway thank for merging
these fixes.

Regards,
Matthias