[PATCH V3 3/6] ARM: stm32: Implement board coding on AV96

[Marek Vasut]

On 4/23/20 9:42 AM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
[...]
>>>>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcom-u-boot.dtsi    |  1 +
>>>>  .../stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi   |  1 +
>>>>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-u-boot.dtsi    |  7 +++
>>>>  board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/Kconfig       |  2 +-
>>>>  board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/board.c       | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  .../dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcom.its              | 39 ++++++++++++
>>>>  .../dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcor.its              | 39 ++++++++++++
>>>>  configs/stm32mp15_dhcom_basic_defconfig       |  3 +
>>>>  configs/stm32mp15_dhcor_basic_defconfig       |  3 +
>>>>  include/configs/dh_stm32mp1.h                 | 15 +++++
>>>>  10 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)  create mode
>>>> 100644 board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcom.its
>>>>  create mode 100644 board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcor.its
>>>>  create mode 100644 include/configs/dh_stm32mp1.h
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have 2 compilation issue on this patch with buildman
>>>
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>
>>> And you are the first user of CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SOURCE...
>>
>> Most certainly not the first, this was used before.
>>
> 
> At least the last one 😊 checked by grep.

Seems a lot of the boards moved over to the script-generated approach in
the meantime, oh well.

>>> I want to propose to copy the file with:
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------- Makefile
> 
> 
> [....]
> 
>>> But then you need to update the patch in .its files....
>>>
>>> => remove no more necessary "../../../"
>>
>> Cam you send this patch, so I can rebase on top of it ?
> 
> Done in :
> 
> [PATCH] Makefile: copy SPL_FIT_SOURCE in build directory
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200423093845.1.Idf086bdb530238139f0066b3fecc01529d7c0b7d@changeid/

Thanks, that works fine. Do you want a V4 of this series with this
adjustment ?