Please pull u-boot-dm/next into -next

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 07:06, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:50:53AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/pipelines/5567
> >
> >
> > Note this is for the 'next' tree.
> >
> > It includes the rename series which would be good to get in early.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> >
> > The following changes since commit ddaa94978583d07ec515e7226e397221d8cc44c8:
> >
> >   Merge tag 'efi-next' of
> > https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi into next
> > (2020-12-10 13:54:33 -0500)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm.git tags/dm-pull-14dec20
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to b7bbd553de0d9752f919dfc616f560f6f2504c14:
> >
> >   checkpatch: Add warnings for unexpected struct names (2020-12-13
> > 16:51:09 -0700)
> >
>
> In general, this is very good and we see small reductions almost
> everywhere.  In a few cases however we see:
> 22: dm: core: Combine the flattree and livetree binding code
>    aarch64: (for 1/1 boards) all -212.0 spl/u-boot-spl:all +40.0 spl/u-boot-spl:text +40.0 text -212.0
>             px30-core-ctouch2-px30: all -212 spl/u-boot-spl:all +40 spl/u-boot-spl:text +40 text -212
>                u-boot: add: 1/-1, grow: 1/-3 bytes: 124/-336 (-212)
>                  function                                   old     new   delta
>                  ofnode_is_enabled                            -      92     +92
>                  dm_scan_fdt_node                           196     228     +32
>                  dm_scan_fdt                                 52      32     -20
>                  dm_scan_fdt_dev                            104      20     -84
>                  dm_extended_scan_fdt                       236     132    -104
>                  static.dm_scan_fdt_live                    128       -    -128
>                spl-u-boot-spl: add: 3/0, grow: 0/-4 bytes: 116/-76 (40)
>                  function                                   old     new   delta
>                  ofnode_next_subnode                          -      40     +40
>                  ofnode_first_subnode                         -      40     +40
>                  ofnode_is_enabled                            -      36     +36
>                  dm_scan_fdt                                 20      16      -4
>                  dm_scan_fdt_dev                             36      20     -16
>                  dm_scan_fdt_node                           168     148     -20
>                  dm_extended_scan_fdt                       168     132     -36
>
> Is there anything we can do about that?  That said:
>
> Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!

I'll take a look. I may have missed a condition.

BTW I am hoping to get a series out around EOM with the next evolution
of of-platdata. It reduces the SPL code size by a decent amount.

Regards,
Simon