Please pull u-boot-dm/next into -next
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Thu Dec 17 03:10:58 CET 2020
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 09:28, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 07:06, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:50:53AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/pipelines/5567
> > >
> > >
> > > Note this is for the 'next' tree.
> > >
> > > It includes the rename series which would be good to get in early.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit ddaa94978583d07ec515e7226e397221d8cc44c8:
> > >
> > > Merge tag 'efi-next' of
> > > https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi into next
> > > (2020-12-10 13:54:33 -0500)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm.git tags/dm-pull-14dec20
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to b7bbd553de0d9752f919dfc616f560f6f2504c14:
> > >
> > > checkpatch: Add warnings for unexpected struct names (2020-12-13
> > > 16:51:09 -0700)
> > >
> >
> > In general, this is very good and we see small reductions almost
> > everywhere. In a few cases however we see:
> > 22: dm: core: Combine the flattree and livetree binding code
> > aarch64: (for 1/1 boards) all -212.0 spl/u-boot-spl:all +40.0 spl/u-boot-spl:text +40.0 text -212.0
> > px30-core-ctouch2-px30: all -212 spl/u-boot-spl:all +40 spl/u-boot-spl:text +40 text -212
> > u-boot: add: 1/-1, grow: 1/-3 bytes: 124/-336 (-212)
> > function old new delta
> > ofnode_is_enabled - 92 +92
> > dm_scan_fdt_node 196 228 +32
> > dm_scan_fdt 52 32 -20
> > dm_scan_fdt_dev 104 20 -84
> > dm_extended_scan_fdt 236 132 -104
> > static.dm_scan_fdt_live 128 - -128
> > spl-u-boot-spl: add: 3/0, grow: 0/-4 bytes: 116/-76 (40)
> > function old new delta
> > ofnode_next_subnode - 40 +40
> > ofnode_first_subnode - 40 +40
> > ofnode_is_enabled - 36 +36
> > dm_scan_fdt 20 16 -4
> > dm_scan_fdt_dev 36 20 -16
> > dm_scan_fdt_node 168 148 -20
> > dm_extended_scan_fdt 168 132 -36
> >
> > Is there anything we can do about that? That said:
The problem here is that we are now using ofnode versions of those
three functions. The only thing I can do is inline them. It does make
things a little more complicated, but I think it is worth it. I'll
send a patch.
> >
> > Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
>
> I'll take a look. I may have missed a condition.
>
> BTW I am hoping to get a series out around EOM with the next evolution
> of of-platdata. It reduces the SPL code size by a decent amount.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list