[PATCH v3 07/10] configs: fu540: Add config file for U-boot SPL

Pragnesh Patel pragnesh.patel at sifive.com
Mon Jan 27 07:50:12 CET 2020


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
>Sent: 24 January 2020 12:21
>To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.patel at sifive.com>
>Cc: U-Boot-Denx <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Atish Patra
><atish.patra at wdc.com>; palmerdabbelt at google.com; Bin Meng
><bmeng.cn at gmail.com>; Paul Walmsley ( Sifive)
><paul.walmsley at sifive.com>; Troy Benjegerdes ( Sifive)
><troy.benjegerdes at sifive.com>; Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com>; Sagar
>Kadam <sagar.kadam at sifive.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] configs: fu540: Add config file for U-boot SPL
>
>On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:21 AM Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.patel at sifive.com>
>wrote:
>>
>> With sifive_fu540_spl_defconfig:
>>
>> U-Boot SPL will be loaded by ZSBL from SD card (replace fsbl.bin with
>> u-boot-spl.bin) and runs in L2 LIM in machine mode and then load FIT
>> image u-boot.itb from 1st partition of SD card (replace fw_payload.bin
>> with u-boot.itb) into RAM.
>>
>> U-boot SPL expects u-boot.itb FIT image in the 1st partition of SD
>> card irrespective of GUID
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.patel at sifive.com>
>> ---
>
>I'm thinking we don't need any separate config for SPL. Say if we have single
>config that creates both SPL and U-Boot proper and give feasibility to the user
>to use
>1) SPL + U-Boot proper
>2) SiFive SPL + U-Boot proper

Sifive SPL ?

>
>We are using a similar approach for other platforms, I guess the same will
>valid here, any comments?


More information about the U-Boot mailing list