[PATCH 05/17] xen: Port Xen hypervizor related code from mini-os

Anastasiia Lukianenko Anastasiia_Lukianenko at epam.com
Fri Jul 3 14:21:49 CEST 2020


Hi Julien,

On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 18:46 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Title: s/hypervizor/hypervisor/

Thank you for pointing :) I will fix it in the next version.

> 
> On 01/07/2020 17:29, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote:
> > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko at epam.com>
> > 
> > Port hypervizor related code from mini-os. Update essential
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> But I would be quite cautious to import code from mini-OS in order
> to 
> support Arm. The port has always been broken and from a look below
> needs 
> to be refined for Arm.

We were referencing the code of Mini-OS from [1] by Huang Shijie and
Volodymyr Babchuk which is for ARM64, so we hope this part should be
ok.

[1] https://github.com/zyzii/mini-os.git

> 
> > arch code to support required bit operations, memory barriers etc.
> > 
> > Copyright for the bits ported belong to at least the following
> > authors,
> > please see related files for details:
> > 
> > Copyright (c) 2002-2003, K A Fraser
> > Copyright (c) 2005, Grzegorz Milos, gm281 at cam.ac.uk,Intel Research
> > Cambridge
> > Copyright (c) 2014, Karim Allah Ahmed <karim.allah.ahmed at gmail.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <
> > oleksandr_andrushchenko at epam.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anastasiia Lukianenko <
> > anastasiia_lukianenko at epam.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/include/asm/xen/system.h |  96 +++++++++++
> >   common/board_r.c                  |  11 ++
> >   drivers/Makefile                  |   1 +
> >   drivers/xen/Makefile              |   5 +
> >   drivers/xen/hypervisor.c          | 277
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/xen.h                     |  11 ++
> >   include/xen/hvm.h                 |  30 ++++
> >   7 files changed, 431 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/xen/system.h
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/xen/Makefile
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/xen/hypervisor.c
> >   create mode 100644 include/xen.h
> >   create mode 100644 include/xen/hvm.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/system.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/system.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..81ab90160e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/system.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> > +/*
> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > + *
> > + * (C) 2014 Karim Allah Ahmed <karim.allah.ahmed at gmail.com>
> > + * (C) 2020, EPAM Systems Inc.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef _ASM_ARM_XEN_SYSTEM_H
> > +#define _ASM_ARM_XEN_SYSTEM_H
> > +
> > +#include <compiler.h>
> > +#include <asm/bitops.h>
> > +
> > +/* If *ptr == old, then store new there (and return new).
> > + * Otherwise, return the old value.
> > + * Atomic.
> > + */
> > +#define synch_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) \
> > +({ __typeof__(*ptr) stored = old; \
> > +	__atomic_compare_exchange_n(ptr, &stored, new, 0,
> > __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST) ? new : old; \
> > +})
> > +
> > +/* As test_and_clear_bit, but using __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST */
> > +static inline int synch_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile void
> > *addr)
> > +{
> > +	u8 *byte = ((u8 *)addr) + (nr >> 3);
> > +	u8 bit = 1 << (nr & 7);
> > +	u8 orig;
> > +
> > +	orig = __atomic_fetch_and(byte, ~bit, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> > +
> > +	return (orig & bit) != 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* As test_and_set_bit, but using __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST */
> > +static inline int synch_test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile void
> > *base)
> > +{
> > +	u8 *byte = ((u8 *)base) + (nr >> 3);
> > +	u8 bit = 1 << (nr & 7);
> > +	u8 orig;
> > +
> > +	orig = __atomic_fetch_or(byte, bit, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> > +
> > +	return (orig & bit) != 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* As set_bit, but using __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST */
> > +static inline void synch_set_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
> > +{
> > +	synch_test_and_set_bit(nr, addr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* As clear_bit, but using __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST */
> > +static inline void synch_clear_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
> > +{
> > +	synch_test_and_clear_bit(nr, addr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* As test_bit, but with a following memory barrier. */
> > +//static inline int synch_test_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
> > +static inline int synch_test_bit(int nr, const void *addr)
> > +{
> > +	int result;
> > +
> > +	result = test_bit(nr, addr);
> > +	barrier();
> > +	return result;
> > +}
> 
> I can understand why we implement sync_* helpers as AFAICT the
> generic 
> helpers are not SMP safe. However...
> 
> > +
> > +#define xchg(ptr, v)	__atomic_exchange_n(ptr, v,
> > __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)
> > +#define xchg(ptr, v)	__atomic_exchange_n(ptr, v,
> > __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)
> > +
> > +#define mb()		dsb()
> > +#define rmb()		dsb()
> > +#define wmb()		dsb()
> > +#define __iormb()	dmb()
> > +#define __iowmb()	dmb()
> 
> Why do you need to re-implement the barriers?

Indeed, we do not need to do this.
I will fix it in the next version.

> 
> > +#define xen_mb()	mb()
> > +#define xen_rmb()	rmb()
> > +#define xen_wmb()	wmb()
> > +
> > +#define smp_processor_id()	0
> 
> Shouldn't this be common?

Currently it is only used by Xen and we are not sure if
any other entity will use it, but we can put that into
arch/arm/include/asm/io.h

> 
> > +
> > +#define to_phys(x)		((unsigned long)(x))
> > +#define to_virt(x)		((void *)(x))
> > +
> > +#define PFN_UP(x)		(unsigned long)(((x) + PAGE_SIZE - 1)
> > >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > +#define PFN_DOWN(x)		(unsigned long)((x) >>
> > PAGE_SHIFT)
> > +#define PFN_PHYS(x)		((unsigned long)(x) <<
> > PAGE_SHIFT)
> > +#define PHYS_PFN(x)		(unsigned long)((x) >>
> > PAGE_SHIFT)
> > +
> > +#define virt_to_pfn(_virt)	(PFN_DOWN(to_phys(_virt)))
> > +#define virt_to_mfn(_virt)	(PFN_DOWN(to_phys(_virt)))
> > +#define mfn_to_virt(_mfn)	(to_virt(PFN_PHYS(_mfn)))
> > +#define pfn_to_virt(_pfn)	(to_virt(PFN_PHYS(_pfn)))
> 
> There is already generic phys <-> virt helpers (see 
> include/asm-generic/io.h). So why do you need to create a new
> version?

Indeed, we do not need to do this.
I will fix it in the next version.

> 
> > +
> > +#endif
> > diff --git a/common/board_r.c b/common/board_r.c
> > index fa57fa9b69..fd36edb4e5 100644
> > --- a/common/board_r.c
> > +++ b/common/board_r.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> >   #include <timer.h>
> >   #include <trace.h>
> >   #include <watchdog.h>
> > +#include <xen.h>
> 
> Do we want to include it for other boards?

For now, we do not have a plan and resources to support
anything other than what we need. Therefore only ARM64.

> 
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_ADDR_MAP
> >   #include <asm/mmu.h>
> >   #endif
> > @@ -462,6 +463,13 @@ static int initr_mmc(void)
> >   }
> >   #endif
> >   
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> > +static int initr_xen(void)
> > +{
> > +	xen_init();
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> >   /*
> >    * Tell if it's OK to load the environment early in boot.
> >    *
> > @@ -769,6 +777,9 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_r[] = {
> >   #endif
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_MMC
> >   	initr_mmc,
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> > +	initr_xen,
> >   #endif
> >   	initr_env,
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_BOOTPARAMS_LEN
> > diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
> > index 94e8c5da17..0dd8891e76 100644
> > --- a/drivers/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/Makefile
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)REMOTEPROC) += remoteproc/
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)TPM) += tpm/
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)ACPI_PMC) += power/acpi_pmc/
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)BOARD) += board/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN) += xen/
> >   
> >   ifndef CONFIG_TPL_BUILD
> >   ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/Makefile b/drivers/xen/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..1211bf2386
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0+
> > +#
> > +# (C) Copyright 2020 EPAM Systems Inc.
> > +
> > +obj-y += hypervisor.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/hypervisor.c b/drivers/xen/hypervisor.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..5883285142
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/hypervisor.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
> > +/*****************************************************************
> > *************
> > + * hypervisor.c
> > + *
> > + * Communication to/from hypervisor.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2002-2003, K A Fraser
> > + * Copyright (c) 2005, Grzegorz Milos, gm281 at cam.ac.uk,Intel
> > Research Cambridge
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, EPAM Systems Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> > obtaining a copy
> > + * of this software and associated documentation files (the
> > "Software"), to
> > + * deal in the Software without restriction, including without
> > limitation the
> > + * rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute,
> > sublicense, and/or
> > + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> > Software is
> > + * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> > + *
> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> > included in
> > + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> > + *
> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> > EXPRESS OR
> > + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> > MERCHANTABILITY,
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO
> > EVENT SHALL THE
> > + * AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES
> > OR OTHER
> > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
> > ARISING
> > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> > OTHER
> > + * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> > + */
> > +#include <common.h>
> > +#include <cpu_func.h>
> > +#include <log.h>
> > +#include <memalign.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/io.h>
> > +#include <asm/armv8/mmu.h>
> > +#include <asm/xen/system.h>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bug.h>
> > +
> > +#include <xen/hvm.h>
> > +#include <xen/interface/memory.h>
> > +
> > +#define active_evtchns(cpu, sh, idx)	\
> > +	((sh)->evtchn_pending[idx] &	\
> > +	 ~(sh)->evtchn_mask[idx])
> > +
> > +int in_callback;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Shared page for communicating with the hypervisor.
> > + * Events flags go here, for example.
> > + */
> > +struct shared_info *HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> > +
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> 
> Is there any plan to support this on x86?

For now, we do not have a plan and resources to support
anything other
than what we need. Therefore only ARM64.

> 
> > +static const char *param_name(int op)
> > +{
> > +#define PARAM(x)[HVM_PARAM_##x] = #x
> > +	static const char *const names[] = {
> > +		PARAM(CALLBACK_IRQ),
> > +		PARAM(STORE_PFN),
> > +		PARAM(STORE_EVTCHN),
> > +		PARAM(PAE_ENABLED),
> > +		PARAM(IOREQ_PFN),
> > +		PARAM(TIMER_MODE),
> > +		PARAM(HPET_ENABLED),
> > +		PARAM(IDENT_PT),
> > +		PARAM(ACPI_S_STATE),
> > +		PARAM(VM86_TSS),
> > +		PARAM(VPT_ALIGN),
> > +		PARAM(CONSOLE_PFN),
> > +		PARAM(CONSOLE_EVTCHN),
> 
> Most of those parameters are never going to be used on Arm. So could 
> this be clobberred?
> 
> > +	};
> > +#undef PARAM
> > +
> > +	if (op >= ARRAY_SIZE(names))
> > +		return "unknown";
> > +
> > +	if (!names[op])
> > +		return "reserved";
> > +
> > +	return names[op];
> > +}
> > +
> > +int hvm_get_parameter_maintain_dcache(int idx, uint64_t *value)
> 
> I would recommend to add some comments explaining when this function
> is 
> meant to be used and what it is doing in regards of the cache.

Thank you for recommendation. I will add comments about this function
in the next version.

> 
> > +{
> > +	struct xen_hvm_param xhv;
> > +	int ret;
> 
> I don't think there is a guarantee that your cache is going to be
> clean 
> when writing xhv. So you likely want to add a
> invalidate_dcache_range() 
> before writing it.

Thank you for advice.
Ah, so we need something like:

...
invalidate_dcache_range((unsigned long)&xhv,
			(unsigned long)&xhv + sizeof(xhv));
xhv.domid = DOMID_SELF;
xhv.index = idx;
invalidate_dcache_range((unsigned long)&xhv,
			(unsigned long)&xhv + sizeof(xhv));
...

> 
> > +
> > +	xhv.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > +	xhv.index = idx;
> > +	invalidate_dcache_range((unsigned long)&xhv,
> > +				(unsigned long)&xhv + sizeof(xhv));
> > +
> > +	ret = HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_param, &xhv);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		pr_err("Cannot get hvm parameter %s (%d): %d!\n",
> > +			   param_name(idx), idx, ret);
> > +		BUG();
> > +	}
> > +	invalidate_dcache_range((unsigned long)&xhv,
> > +				(unsigned long)&xhv + sizeof(xhv));
> > +
> > +	*value = xhv.value;
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int hvm_get_parameter(int idx, uint64_t *value)
> > +{
> > +	struct xen_hvm_param xhv;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	xhv.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > +	xhv.index = idx;
> > +	ret = HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_param, &xhv);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		pr_err("Cannot get hvm parameter %s (%d): %d!\n",
> > +			   param_name(idx), idx, ret);
> > +		BUG();
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	*value = xhv.value;
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int hvm_set_parameter(int idx, uint64_t value)
> > +{
> > +	struct xen_hvm_param xhv;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	xhv.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > +	xhv.index = idx;
> > +	xhv.value = value;
> > +	ret = HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_set_param, &xhv);
> > +
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		pr_err("Cannot get hvm parameter %s (%d): %d!\n",
> > +			   param_name(idx), idx, ret);
> > +		BUG();
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct shared_info *map_shared_info(void *p)
> > +{
> > +	struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp;
> > +
> > +	HYPERVISOR_shared_info = (struct shared_info
> > *)memalign(PAGE_SIZE,
> > +								PAGE_SI
> > ZE);
> > +	if (HYPERVISOR_shared_info == NULL)
> > +		BUG();
> > +
> > +	xatp.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > +	xatp.idx = 0;
> > +	xatp.space = XENMAPSPACE_shared_info;
> > +	xatp.gpfn = virt_to_pfn(HYPERVISOR_shared_info);
> > +	if (HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_add_to_physmap, &xatp) != 0)
> > +		BUG();
> > +
> > +	return HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void unmap_shared_info(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct xen_remove_from_physmap xrtp;
> > +
> > +	xrtp.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > +	xrtp.gpfn = virt_to_pfn(HYPERVISOR_shared_info);
> > +	if (HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_remove_from_physmap, &xrtp) !=
> > 0)
> > +		BUG();
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +void do_hypervisor_callback(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long l1, l2, l1i, l2i;
> > +	unsigned int port;
> > +	int cpu = 0;
> > +	struct shared_info *s = HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> > +	struct vcpu_info *vcpu_info = &s->vcpu_info[cpu];
> > +
> > +	in_callback = 1;
> > +
> > +	vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending = 0;
> > +	/* NB x86. No need for a barrier here -- XCHG is a barrier on
> > x86. */
> > +#if !defined(__i386__) && !defined(__x86_64__)
> > +	/* Clear master flag /before/ clearing selector flag. */
> > +	wmb();
> > +#endif
> > +	l1 = xchg(&vcpu_info->evtchn_pending_sel, 0);
> > +
> > +	while (l1 != 0) {
> > +		l1i = __ffs(l1);
> > +		l1 &= ~(1UL << l1i);
> > +
> > +		while ((l2 = active_evtchns(cpu, s, l1i)) != 0) {
> > +			l2i = __ffs(l2);
> > +			l2 &= ~(1UL << l2i);
> > +
> > +			port = (l1i * (sizeof(unsigned long) * 8)) +
> > l2i;
> > +			/* TODO: handle new event: do_event(port,
> > regs); */
> > +			/* Suppress -Wunused-but-set-variable */
> > +			(void)(port);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> 
> You likely want a memory barrier here as otherwise in_callback could
> be 
> written/seen before the loop end.
> 

We are not running in a multi-threaded environment, so probably
in_callback should be fine as is? Or it can be removed completely as
there are no currently users of it.

> > +
> > +	in_callback = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void force_evtchn_callback(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef XEN_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK
> > +	int save;
> > +#endif
> > +	struct vcpu_info *vcpu;
> > +
> > +	vcpu = &HYPERVISOR_shared_info->vcpu_info[smp_processor_id()];
> 
> On Arm, this is only valid for vCPU0. For all the other vCPUs, you
> will 
> want to register a vCPU shared info.
> 

According to Mini-OS this is also expected for x86 [1] as both ARM and
x86 are defining smp_processor_id as 0. Do you expect any issue with
that?

[1] 
http://xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=mini-os.git;a=blob;f=include/x86/os.h;h=a73b63e5e4e0f4b7fa7ca944739f2c3b8a956833;hb=HEAD#l10

> > +#ifdef XEN_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK
> > +	save = vcpu->evtchn_upcall_mask;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +	while (vcpu->evtchn_upcall_pending) {
> > +#ifdef XEN_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK
> > +		vcpu->evtchn_upcall_mask = 1;
> > +#endif
> > +		barrier();
> 
> What are you trying to prevent with this barrier? In particular why 
> would the compiler be an issue but not the processor?

This is the original code from Mini-OS and it seems that the barriers
are leftovers from some old code. We do not define
XEN_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK, so this function can be stripped a lot with
barriers removed completely.

> 
> > +		do_hypervisor_callback(NULL);
> > +		barrier();
> > +#ifdef XEN_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK
> > +		vcpu->evtchn_upcall_mask = save;
> > +		barrier();
> 
> Same here.

Same as above.

> 
> > +#endif
> > +	};
> > +}
> > +
> > +void mask_evtchn(uint32_t port)
> > +{
> > +	struct shared_info *s = HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> > +	synch_set_bit(port, &s->evtchn_mask[0]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void unmask_evtchn(uint32_t port)
> > +{
> > +	struct shared_info *s = HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> > +	struct vcpu_info *vcpu_info = &s-
> > >vcpu_info[smp_processor_id()];
> > +
> > +	synch_clear_bit(port, &s->evtchn_mask[0]);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The following is basically the equivalent of
> > 'hw_resend_irq'. Just like
> > +	 * a real IO-APIC we 'lose the interrupt edge' if the channel
> > is masked.
> > +	 */
> 
> This seems to be out-of-context now, you might want to update it.

I am not sure I understand it right.
Could you please clarify what do you mean under the word "update"?

> 
> > +	if (synch_test_bit(port, &s->evtchn_pending[0]) &&
> > +	    !synch_test_and_set_bit(port / (sizeof(unsigned long) * 8),
> > +				    &vcpu_info->evtchn_pending_sel)) {
> > +		vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending = 1;
> > +#ifdef XEN_HAVE_PV_UPCALL_MASK
> > +		if (!vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_mask)
> > +#endif
> > +			force_evtchn_callback();
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +void clear_evtchn(uint32_t port)
> > +{
> > +	struct shared_info *s = HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> > +
> > +	synch_clear_bit(port, &s->evtchn_pending[0]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void xen_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	debug("%s\n", __func__);
> 
> Is this a left-over?

I think this is a relevant comment for debug purpose.
But we do not mind removing it, if it seems superfluous.

> 
> > +
> > +	map_shared_info(NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > diff --git a/include/xen.h b/include/xen.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..1d6f74cc92
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/xen.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > +/*
> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > + *
> > + * (C) 2020, EPAM Systems Inc.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef __XEN_H__
> > +#define __XEN_H__
> > +
> > +void xen_init(void);
> > +
> > +#endif /* __XEN_H__ */
> > diff --git a/include/xen/hvm.h b/include/xen/hvm.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..89de9625ca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/xen/hvm.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> > +/*
> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > + *
> > + * Simple wrappers around HVM functions
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2002-2003, K A Fraser
> > + * Copyright (c) 2005, Grzegorz Milos, gm281 at cam.ac.uk,Intel
> > Research Cambridge
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, EPAM Systems Inc.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef XEN_HVM_H__
> > +#define XEN_HVM_H__
> > +
> > +#include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> > +#include <xen/interface/hvm/params.h>
> > +#include <xen/interface/xen.h>
> > +
> > +extern struct shared_info *HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> > +
> > +int hvm_get_parameter(int idx, uint64_t *value);
> > +int hvm_get_parameter_maintain_dcache(int idx, uint64_t *value);
> > +int hvm_set_parameter(int idx, uint64_t value);
> > +
> > +struct shared_info *map_shared_info(void *p);
> > +void unmap_shared_info(void);
> > +void do_hypervisor_callback(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > +void mask_evtchn(uint32_t port);
> > +void unmask_evtchn(uint32_t port);
> > +void clear_evtchn(uint32_t port);
> > +
> > +#endif /* XEN_HVM_H__ */
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 

Regards,
Anastasiia


More information about the U-Boot mailing list