[PATCH v2] i2c: eeprom: Use reg property instead of offset and size

[Michal Simek]

On 06. 07. 20 7:56, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> Am 17.06.2020 um 05:12 schrieb Simon Glass:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 07:53, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16. 06. 20 15:43, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 07:41, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove adhoc dt binding for fixed-partition definition for i2c eeprom.
>>>>> fixed-partition are using reg property instead of offset/size pair.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> - Bootcount tested on zynqmp zcu104
>>>>> - Add missing address/size cells
>>>>> - Use dev_read_addr_size_index
>>>>> - Check parameters
>>>>>
>>>>> Just build tested - ge_bx50v3_defconfig
>>>>> Definitely please retest on hardware.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/arm/dts/imx53-ppd-uboot.dtsi    | 15 +++++++++------
>>>>>   arch/arm/dts/imx6q-bx50v3-uboot.dtsi | 12 +++++++-----
>>>>>   drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c            | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>>>>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We have a sandbox I2C EEPROM, so you should be able to use the
>>>> existing test, right?
>>>
>>> The way how I have tested it was via drivers/bootcount/i2c-eeprom.c
>>> driver which define which eeprom stores it.
>>> Do you have any existing tests for bootcount done via sandbox?
>>>
>>> If bootcount is not the right way to go then doing this code should be
>>> better way. It means just define some partitions (0 size - for failure,
>>> then proper range, proper write, write behind size for failure).
>>
>> Can you use drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c?
>>
>> See test/dm/bootcount.c for the sandbox tests for bootcount.
> 
> Any updates on this?
> 
> @Robert: May you find time to test this change and give us feedback?

Just came from my vacation and it will take some time to get to this.
If anybody wants to create that test feel free to do it.
Definitely testing on Robert side would be good.

Thanks,
Michal