[PATCH] power: pmic: pca9450: fix i2c address for PCA9450A

Sébastien Szymanski sebastien.szymanski at armadeus.com
Mon Jul 13 11:20:19 CEST 2020


Hi,

On 7/13/20 10:47 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH] power: pmic: pca9450: fix i2c address for PCA9450A
>>
>> Change the I2C Slave Address of the PCA9450A:
>>
>> 0x35 --> 0x25
>>
>> According to the NXP documentation, in the datasheet:
>>
>> PCA9450DS.pdf (Rev 1.0 - 19 November 2019)
>>
>> in the table 19 "PCA9450 I2C Slave Address) at page 27/96,
>>
>> all the PCA9450 have the same I2C address.
>> In particular, in case of 7-bit Slave Address, the address is 0x25.
>>
>> This modification was tested on the imx8mm-evk, with the SOC equipped with
>> the PCA9450A instead of the previous ROHM BD71847.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi at asem.it>
>> ---
>>  drivers/power/pmic/pca9450.c      | 2 +-
>>  drivers/power/pmic/pmic_pca9450.c | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/pmic/pca9450.c b/drivers/power/pmic/pca9450.c
>> index 0c9d9a366e..c7f8b80954 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/pmic/pca9450.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/pmic/pca9450.c
>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static struct dm_pmic_ops pca9450_ops = {  };
>>
>>  static const struct udevice_id pca9450_ids[] = {
>> -	{ .compatible = "nxp,pca9450a", .data = 0x35, },
>> +	{ .compatible = "nxp,pca9450a", .data = 0x25, },
>>  	{ .compatible = "nxp,pca9450b", .data = 0x25, },
>>  	{ }
>>  };
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/pmic/pmic_pca9450.c
>> b/drivers/power/pmic/pmic_pca9450.c
>> index 67a9090200..c0fb78c4cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/pmic/pmic_pca9450.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/pmic/pmic_pca9450.c
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int power_pca9450a_init(unsigned char bus)
>>  	p->name = pca9450_name;
>>  	p->interface = PMIC_I2C;
>>  	p->number_of_regs = PCA9450_REG_NUM;
>> -	p->hw.i2c.addr = 0x35;
>> +	p->hw.i2c.addr = 0x25;
>>  	p->hw.i2c.tx_num = 1;
>>  	p->bus = bus;
> 
> There was a thread to address this, but not take udevice_id into consideration.
> Your version looks better.

In that thread [1], it was suggested to merge both function
power_pca9450{a,b}_init into one function power_pca9450_init.

[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2020-June/418123.html

Regards,

> 
> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> 
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
> 


-- 
Sébastien Szymanski, Armadeus Systems
Software engineer


More information about the U-Boot mailing list