[PATCH 1/3] treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Fri Jul 17 22:58:00 CEST 2020
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 03:13:33PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
> clearly says:
>
> It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
>
> Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
> headers self-contained.
>
> Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
>
> void foo(bd_t *bd);
>
> This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
>
> To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
>
> #include <asm/u-boot.h>
> void foo(bd_t *bd);
>
> Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
>
> If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
> declaration as follows:
>
> struct bd_info;
> void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
>
> Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
>
> I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
>
> <smpl>
> @@
> typedef bd_t;
> @@
> -bd_t
> +struct bd_info
> </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy at kernel.org>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200717/968ee277/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list