[PATCH v4 1/5] cmd: bind: allow to bind driver with driver data

[Patrice CHOTARD]

Hi Tom

On 7/7/20 10:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:06:15PM +0200, Patrice Chotard wrote:
>
>> Initial implementation invokes device_bind_with_driver_data()
>> with driver_data parameter equal to 0.
>> For driver with driver data, the bind command can't bind
>> correctly this driver or even worse causes data abort as shown below:
>>
>> As example, for debug purpose on STM32MP1 platform, ethernet (dwc_eth_qos.c)
>> driver needed to be unbinded/binded. This driver is using driver data:
>>
>> static const struct udevice_id eqos_ids[] = {
>>     {
>>         .compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-eqos",
>>         .data = (ulong)&eqos_tegra186_config
>>     },
>>     {
>>         .compatible = "snps,dwmac-4.20a",
>>         .data = (ulong)&eqos_stm32_config
>>     },
>>
>>     { }
>> };
>>
>> After unbinding/binding this driver and probing it (with the dhcp command),
>> we got a prefetch abort as below:
>>
>> STM32MP> unbind eth ethernet at 5800a000
>> STM32MP> bind /soc/ethernet at 5800a000 eth_eqos
>> STM32MP> dhcp
>> prefetch abort
>> pc : [<4310801c>]          lr : [<ffc8f4ad>]
>> reloc pc : [<035ba01c>]    lr : [<c01414ad>]
>> sp : fdaf19b0  ip : ffcea83c     fp : 00000001
>> r10: ffcfd4a0  r9 : fdaffed0     r8 : 00000000
>> r7 : ffcff304  r6 : fdc63220     r5 : 00000000  r4 : fdc5b108
>> r3 : 43108020  r2 : 00003d39     r1 : ffcea544  r0 : fdc63220
>> Flags: nZCv  IRQs off  FIQs off  Mode SVC_32
>> Code: data abort
>> pc : [<ffc4f9c0>]          lr : [<ffc4f9ad>]
>> reloc pc : [<c01019c0>]    lr : [<c01019ad>]
>> sp : fdaf18b8  ip : 00000000     fp : 00000001
>> r10: ffcd69b2  r9 : fdaffed0     r8 : ffcd69aa
>> r7 : 00000000  r6 : 00000008     r5 : 4310801c  r4 : fffffffc
>> r3 : 00000001  r2 : 00000028     r1 : 00000000  r0 : 00000006
>> Flags: NzCv  IRQs on  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32 (T)
>> Code: 2f00 d1e9 2c00 dce9 (f855) 2024
>> Resetting CPU ...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at st.com>
>> Cc: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot at ti.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Sorry for the delay in getting to this.  Currently, this breaks the dm
> unit tests on sandbox, can you please investigate?  Thanks!
>
A v5 has been submitted fixing the dm unit test regression

Thanks

Patrice