[PATCH 1/1] vexpress_ca9x4: Enable use of correct DTB file and restore EFI loader.

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Mon Mar 2 14:01:09 CET 2020


On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:22:27AM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote:
> On 28/02/2020 16:32, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 06:22:16PM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote:
> > 
> >> EFI was disabled in f95b8a4b5f64f because of the missing DTB file,
> >> and indeed, the DTB file is required to load recent versions of GRUB
> >> (2.04) correctly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kristian Amlie <kristian.amlie at northern.tech>
> >> ---
> >>  configs/vexpress_ca9x4_defconfig  | 2 +-
> >>  include/configs/vexpress_common.h | 3 ++-
> >>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/configs/vexpress_ca9x4_defconfig b/configs/vexpress_ca9x4_defconfig
> >> index 2119df6b10..6bd1f253b6 100644
> >> --- a/configs/vexpress_ca9x4_defconfig
> >> +++ b/configs/vexpress_ca9x4_defconfig
> >> @@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ CONFIG_SMC911X_32_BIT=y
> >>  CONFIG_BAUDRATE=38400
> >>  CONFIG_CONS_INDEX=0
> >>  CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT=y
> >> -# CONFIG_EFI_LOADER is not set
> >> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE="vexpress-v2p-ca9.dtb"
> >> diff --git a/include/configs/vexpress_common.h b/include/configs/vexpress_common.h
> >> index 7f215a6707..e73658a9e6 100644
> >> --- a/include/configs/vexpress_common.h
> >> +++ b/include/configs/vexpress_common.h
> >> @@ -207,7 +207,8 @@
> >>  			"devtmpfs.mount=0  vmalloc=256M\0" \
> >>  		"bootflash=run flashargs; " \
> >>  			"cp ${ramdisk_addr} ${ramdisk_addr_r} ${maxramdisk}; " \
> >> -			"bootm ${kernel_addr} ${ramdisk_addr_r}\0"
> >> +			"bootm ${kernel_addr} ${ramdisk_addr_r}\0" \
> >> +		"fdtfile=" CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE "\0"
> >>  
> >>  /* FLASH and environment organization */
> >>  #define PHYS_FLASH_SIZE			0x04000000	/* 64MB */
> > 
> > Did you test build all of the vexpress platforms?  There's a common file
> > for the 5 different ones.  Thanks!
> 
> The two boards vexpress_aemv8a_juno_defconfig and
> vexpress_aemv8a_semi_defconfig don't compile at all, even without the
> patch. The other three compile just fine both with and without the patch.

Don't compile where / how?  All 5 compile with their defconfigs today.
Thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200302/ca1e1930/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list