[PATCH 2/4] mx6cuboxi: enable MMC iomux on board_early_init_f

[Walter Lozano]

Hi Baruch,

Thanks for you comments.

On 8/3/20 01:38, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Thanks for your SPL_DM support work on this platform.
>
> One comment inline below.
>
> On Wed, Mar 04 2020, Walter Lozano wrote:
>> MMC iomux is done on board_mmc_init which is valid when DM_MMC is not
>> enabled. After enabling it, the iomux setup needs to be moved to a
>> valid place.
>>
>> This patch moves the MMC iomux to board_early_init_f where other iomux
>> is done.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano <walter.lozano at collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   board/solidrun/mx6cuboxi/mx6cuboxi.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/board/solidrun/mx6cuboxi/mx6cuboxi.c b/board/solidrun/mx6cuboxi/mx6cuboxi.c
>> index 6a96f9ecdb..71c77ad2a2 100644
>> --- a/board/solidrun/mx6cuboxi/mx6cuboxi.c
>> +++ b/board/solidrun/mx6cuboxi/mx6cuboxi.c
>> @@ -179,6 +179,28 @@ int board_mmc_get_env_dev(int devno)
>>   
>>   #define USDHC2_CD_GPIO  IMX_GPIO_NR(1, 4)
>>   
>> +static int setup_iomux_mmc(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct src *psrc = (struct src *)SRC_BASE_ADDR;
>> +	unsigned reg = readl(&psrc->sbmr1) >> 11;
> This mostly duplicates the existing mmc_init_spl() routine. As I understand,
> mmc_init_spl() becomes dead code once you enable CONFIG_SPL_DM in patch #4 of
> this series. Can you remove mmc_init_spl() in a followup patch? Both
> struct fsl_esdhc_cfg can also be removed, I believe.

You are right, if we enable both CONFIG_SPL_DM and CONFIG_SPL_DM_MMC the 
function mmc_init_spl is useless, so I understand we can safety remove it.

> baruch
>
Regards,

Walter