[PATCH 1/1 v1] cmd: gpio: Correct do_gpio() return value

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Tue Mar 10 13:37:43 CET 2020


On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:47:33AM +0000, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 12:06 AM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Luka Kovacic wrote:
> >
> > > Use the correct return value in function do_gpio() and update
> > > commands documentation with the return values from command_ret_t enum.
> > >
> > > CMD_RET_SUCCESS is returned on command success and CMD_RET_FAILURE is
> > > returned on command failure.
> > >
> > > The command was returning the pin value, which caused confusion when
> > > debugging (#define DEBUG).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luka Kovacic <luka.kovacic at sartura.hr>
> > > Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko at sartura.hr>
> >
> > Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
> >
> 
> I just pulled in HEAD for a test build and our boot scripts are broken
> with this gpio change - I don't see a way to get the value of a gpio
> pin in a script now?
> 
> Whilst I agree what's there was wrong, I'm really not sure we can
> change an existing interface like this.

Sigh, this is what I was worried about.  If folks don't have a
suggestion on how to correct things again I'm going to revert this
change, sorry for the noise, thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200310/77ea319a/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list