[PATCH 07/12] net: smc911x: Drop weak alias from 32bit accessors
Masahiro Yamada
yamada.masahiro at socionext.com
Tue Mar 17 07:27:07 CET 2020
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 2:00 AM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> These accessors are not overriden by any board, and even if they were,
> this is something which should be handled via DM now, so remove the
> weak alias option. Moreover, drop the inline keyword, as the compiler
> can decide better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at gmail.com>
> Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
This is good.
I would swap the patch order 06 and 07 so that
I would need to touch only one file, though.
> ---
> drivers/net/smc911x.c | 14 ++++----------
> examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> index c806757605..d798df9ec6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> @@ -44,28 +44,22 @@ static const struct chip_id chip_ids[] = {
> #endif
>
> #if defined (CONFIG_SMC911X_32_BIT)
> -static inline u32 __smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> +static u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> {
> return *(volatile u32*)(dev->iobase + offset);
> }
> -u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> - __attribute__((weak, alias("__smc911x_reg_read")));
>
> -static inline void __smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev,
> - u32 offset, u32 val)
> +static void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset, u32 val)
> {
> *(volatile u32*)(dev->iobase + offset) = val;
> }
> -void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset, u32 val)
> - __attribute__((weak, alias("__smc911x_reg_write")));
> #elif defined (CONFIG_SMC911X_16_BIT)
> -static inline u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> +static u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> {
> volatile u16 *addr_16 = (u16 *)(dev->iobase + offset);
> return ((*addr_16 & 0x0000ffff) | (*(addr_16 + 1) << 16));
> }
> -static inline void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev,
> - u32 offset, u32 val)
> +static void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset, u32 val)
> {
> *(volatile u16 *)(dev->iobase + offset) = (u16)val;
> *(volatile u16 *)(dev->iobase + offset + 2) = (u16)(val >> 16);
> diff --git a/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c b/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> index 19ad9e6297..270588bcf5 100644
> --- a/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> +++ b/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> @@ -51,28 +51,22 @@ static const struct chip_id chip_ids[] = {
> };
>
> #if defined (CONFIG_SMC911X_32_BIT)
> -static inline u32 __smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> +static u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> {
> return *(volatile u32*)(dev->iobase + offset);
> }
> -u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> - __attribute__((weak, alias("__smc911x_reg_read")));
>
> -static inline void __smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev,
> - u32 offset, u32 val)
> +static void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset, u32 val)
> {
> *(volatile u32*)(dev->iobase + offset) = val;
> }
> -void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset, u32 val)
> - __attribute__((weak, alias("__smc911x_reg_write")));
> #elif defined (CONFIG_SMC911X_16_BIT)
> -static inline u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> +static u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset)
> {
> volatile u16 *addr_16 = (u16 *)(dev->iobase + offset);
> - return ((*addr_16 & 0x0000ffff) | (*(addr_16 + 1) << 16));
> + return (*addr_16 & 0x0000ffff) | (*(addr_16 + 1) << 16);
> }
> -static inline void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev,
> - u32 offset, u32 val)
> +static void smc911x_reg_write(struct eth_device *dev, u32 offset, u32 val)
> {
> *(volatile u16 *)(dev->iobase + offset) = (u16)val;
> *(volatile u16 *)(dev->iobase + offset + 2) = (u16)(val >> 16);
> --
> 2.25.0
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list