[PATCH v2 02/14] image: Be a little more verbose when checking signatures

[Simon Glass]

It is useful to be a little more specific about what is being checked.
Update a few messages to help with this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2: None

 common/image-fit.c | 2 +-
 tools/image-host.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/image-fit.c b/common/image-fit.c
index 7cf02b4574..a5c85ede8d 100644
--- a/common/image-fit.c
+++ b/common/image-fit.c
@@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ int fit_image_load(bootm_headers_t *images, ulong addr,
 		fit_uname = fit_get_name(fit, noffset, NULL);
 	}
 	if (noffset < 0) {
-		puts("Could not find subimage node\n");
+		printf("Could not find subimage node type '%s'\n", prop_name);
 		bootstage_error(bootstage_id + BOOTSTAGE_SUB_SUBNODE);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
diff --git a/tools/image-host.c b/tools/image-host.c
index 76a361b9d6..b3ec197dc9 100644
--- a/tools/image-host.c
+++ b/tools/image-host.c
@@ -1034,7 +1034,8 @@ int fit_check_sign(const void *fit, const void *key)
 	if (!cfg_noffset)
 		return -1;
 
-	printf("Verifying Hash Integrity ... ");
+	printf("Verifying Hash Integrity for node '%s'... ",
+	       fdt_get_name(fit, cfg_noffset, NULL));
 	ret = fit_config_verify(fit, cfg_noffset);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-- 
2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog